Port of Auckland Debate

Port of Auckland Debate is Back

 

I have brought back my Auckland Waterfront Index to the front page after putting into suspension with Port of Auckland (POAL) making another attempt in its bid to extend the port in its current location at the downtown waterfront.

This has been brought on after commentary from ATB on Port of Auckland’s scaled back expansion program proposal which can be seen at this post: Do we need a port in downtown Auckland?

 

Admittedly I was wondering why I got such a large spike in traffic on what are usually quiet Sundays for me. I send my thanks to Sacha for his link back to my “POSSIBLE PORT OF AUCKLAND RELOCATIONS” post which did stir some debate although somewhat one-sided.

 

So it seems after a 12 month break, the POAL chestnut is back on the table with me opening around of commentary on Facebook:

Tony Gibson is as unvisionary as Councillor Ann Hartley who shot down Part Two of the Upper North Island Port Review which to look at ALL OPTIONS for Port of Auckland. And by ALL OPTIONS I mean whether:
1) Expanding the Port as is where is, is a good idea
2) Moving the Port to Clevedon is a good idea}
3) Moving the Port to Marsden Point and Port of Tauranga is a good idea

The review would have looked at all costs AND benefits to each of those three options so at least Auckland knows where it stands in any future decisions
http://www.3news.co.nz/Ports-move-too-costly—CEO/tabid/421/articleID/293399/Default.aspx

 

Port of Auckland have replied through Twitter after I posted the above with them noting that I am most likely to be opposed to the new expansion idea – which I am.

 

A reminder to all that I support moving the Port to Clevedon unless a comprehensive report will all the pro and con’s for my reading and comprehension is undertaken and presented.

 

I better keep an eye out when the public consultations start on POAL again…

A New City – Marsden Point City

Marsden Pt city work will create 440 jobs – Property – NZ Herald News.

It must be the Sim City in me that has me fascinated with all things planning and urban development. Then again I did create this “work-in-progress” monster called Solaria with 3.7 million sims and due to hold 5 million sims upon completion by the time Sim City 5 comes out next year:

Solaria at 3.8 million sims

Still working on the city as I finish off The Core, Auckland District and start on the low density sprawl and rural hamlets that would form the outer reaches of this mega city. If anyone is interested – the transport system has its merits such as it takes 75 minutes to cross one end of the map to the other by car (half by High Speed Rail), and the inner city is known as a Walking City as 85% of sims in the area (which houses 55% of the total population of the “region”) either walk or take public transport – the rest of the region is mixed either at 50:50 or car dominated (outer fringes). However the Highway system is incomplete in The Core (bad planning – oops) and thoroughfare connections are missing in some places – oh well.

For something opposite to the mega-city I do have Neo Solaria which I started on this year:

Neo Solaria

Set in the Western Bay of Plenty topography, Neo Solaria is my final SC4 city before SC5 is due out next year. Neo Solaria is planned to hold 4 million sims and will be developed as a final form from Solaria. Meaning Solaria has been developed over nine years with very distinct planning changes over the nine years. Solaria is basically one big planning experiment on different planning ideas I have learned over time – while Neo Solaria will take the best of all the learning over that nine years and be applied in the new mega city.

Both cities however I deem organic with their intensification, sprawl and ad-hoc development as I have never been a fan of the Master Plan City whether everything is planned and built down to the last detail. Essentially I lay down the infrastructure, parks and civic structures (fire, police, education, medical), lay out the zones and left “forces” do the rest without my intervening hand (much). Urban renewal is often automatic (market driven in the real world) although there are times where I did lead urban renewal efforts from time to time (the Capital District was the main one). Those who have read my submission should be able to draw the line from my submission to my SC4 works.  And for those who are really concerned, my extensive mass transit system actually makes a profit overall while delivering a first class service (well we get overcrowding on some lines) – but essentially the way I lay the transit system it was done in tandem with any development (or “designated” to be built later but the route was available – much like the land for the South West Rail Line following State Highway 20 from Onehunga to Avondale) rather than AFTER THE FACT as seen often in Auckland and soon to be in Christchurch.

Now after all that – the Herald article at hand. The piece about Marsden “City” due to be built near Marsden Point caught my attention. Check this ouit:

North Holdings is creating a mixture of commercial and residential development spread over 135ha within the existing Northgate and Port Marsden industrial estates Company director Oliver Scott said work on the development of a mixed-use town centre comprising about 765,000sq m of land area was expected to start within six months. He said commercial and industrial buildings would probably lead the construction, followed by residential units. Stage one of the development will include 22,000sq m of retail space and 20,000sq m of other commercial activity, 250 residential house lots, 150 apartments above retail and a variety of industrial uses. The development is part of the Whangarei District Council‘s structure plan which allows for 60,000sq m of net floor area for retail and 82,000sq m for non-retail commercial use.

There can be up to 2200 residential units. Choices for residential living include detached houses, attached town-houses, terraced housing and apartments, with most around a large neighbourhood park. A variety of urban parks, as well as pedestrian and cycle facilities, would be developed over 5ha. Scott said new zoning would also allow for retirement living and educational facilities. Another company, TR Developments, plans to construct a university and residential apartments close to North Holdings’ project.

Yes my mouth is watering over this, especially when you get these benefits:

He said Northland’s economy would get a huge boost from the project, together with a $500 million refinery expansion announced by Refining New Zealand which would create more than 350 jobs. ”There’s the [Marsden] port, good climate, nice beaches and the Hoppers marine development as well and there’s every likelihood that North Port will continue to expand and very easily pick up business from Auckland.”

And the good news is:

Whangarei District Council and the Environment Court have given North Holdings, the company spearheading the move, the all-clear.

As well as some forward planning seen here:

Roading and other infrastructure were largely in place, he said, but North Holdings would need to upgrade Casey Rd as the centre’s main street and to carry out additional landscaping. ”The main thing is we now have certainty the project will happen, it’s just a matter of when. It has all the hallmarks of long-term sustainable development,” Scott said. He is encouraging job-generating businesses to move into the area. The entire project will take between 15 and 20 years to complete.

North Holdings has spent $75 million developing infrastructure at the Northgate industrial park over several years.

I will be watching this project very carefully – as it might teach Auckland a few things on urban development ESPECIALLY when it seems it is privately rather than council led (much like my submission calls for (Private Led through the SLPD scheme I proposed)). To be honest I would not mind going up to Marsden Point and meeting the brainchild or rather brainchildren of this scheme because I would like to see this work for Manukau and Papakura – especially if I can get POAL to move to South East Auckland!     The only thing that needs to be done is for Kiwi Rail to build the Marsden Point Spur Line to connect Marsden Point and Marsden City to the North Auckland Line to allow a full rail connection from Marsden back to Auckland (oh and an upgrade to the NAL as well).

Auckland Council should be kicking themselves here for not taking a trip up north to check out this development. Tell you what – if I was ever on Auckland Council one of my first missions would be (after setting up the office and holding some constituent meetings) to visit Marsden City and see how it was done and how it can be adapted for Auckland! No need to go overseas when we have a masterpiece right HERE on our own door step!

My SLPD Idea as in my Submission to The Auckland Plan

Link

A Tactical Victory with Port of Auckland

As I was doing my usual rounds on the Internet – the article from the NZ Herald (linked above) came up stating that Auckland Council had put the port expansion on hold – for now.

According to the article:

The Auckland Council has put the brakes on further expansion of the Auckland port into the Waitemata Harbour but stopped short of putting a permanent end to the expansion. The decision was made in a Council meeting this morning. They had planned to extend the port 250m into the prized harbour. The Port Development Plan proposed the larger site to cope with a 400 per cent increase in traffic before 2055. Today the Council voted to undertake an extensive review of the role of Ports of Auckland before deciding on whether to support further expansion into the harbour.

Councillors voted down an amendment from councillor Mike Lee not to support any further expansion beyond the reclamation already consented for.

Although I have been critical of Cllr Lee in the past – his amendment if it went through would have given Auckland some certainty and to which I would have backed. But at the same time I can see the merit of voting down the amendment for now with an “extensive review” now being promised by Auckland Council.

Now this is a tactical victory for people power here in Auckland – it really is, however for me personally it is also a case of a bitter victory at that. The Council has said it would now hold an extensive review – that is nice but while I was disappointed last Saturday after I got a letter from Auckland Council Investment Limited (who looks after Port of Auckland), now I am pretty pissed off that the Council is now deciding to hold a review.

Readers of this blog might recall last month I had sent a letter to every single Auckland Councillor and the Mayor calling for an enquiry into POAL. An enquiry looking at the industrial relations dispute, the ownership model AND location options for POAL. Question Five of the proposed enquiry was the following:

For the sake of optimal Return on Investment and Productivity in benefit to the wider economy and social environment: What location would be most suited for Port of Auckland:

  • Port stays where it is and infrastructure upgrades are committed
  • Port gets relocated to somewhere INSIDE Auckland, example south-east Auckland
  • Port is relocated somewhere OUTSIDE Auckland. That would mean Port of Tauranga, and Marsden Point in Northland – which would also give way to subsequent infrastructure upgrades as well.

On Saturday gone I had received a letter of reply from Gary Swift – CEO of ACIL stating that in regards to Question Five:

There are no plans to relocate the Port.  The cost of doing is estimated to be in the billions of dollars,  which  would  significantly  jeopardise  the Return  on  Equity  objective. It is  also important to note that to cater for future growth, both the Auckland and Tauranga ports will be needed, and both will need to expand to the full extent of their current plans, to prevent the upper North Island facing a future deficit in port infrastructure.

And as for the enquiry:

The POAL board began work last year to lift performance  across the entire organisation. For that reason, we do not see any need for an independent  inquiry into POAL.

Forgive me if I see a sense of irony in this, but ACIL have said NO to an enquiry that would look at the location options of the port INCLUDING KEEPING IT WHERE IT IS NOW! But Auckland Council are now deciding to stop any expansion for the moment and hold an:

Today the Council voted to undertake an extensive review of the role of Ports of Auckland before deciding on whether to support further expansion into the harbour.

Forgive Me, but what is going on Councillors and is there any forward thinking here? There does not seem to be in this instance although I am keen for any responses from councillors on that matter.

This issue could have been dealt with and a pile of agitation from the public and concerned interest groups PLUS any embarrassment if the enquiry was held in the first place. Also that enquiry could have given us ratepayers something a little more to go on for submissions to the Draft Long Term Plan 2012-2022 and 2015-2025 (when that comes up  in due time).

Never mind – the review is about to be set and I might send THAT LETTER again to every single Councillor and the Mayor’s Office asking for that enquiry.

Speaking of which, what is this review’s scope?

A piece from Campbell Live last night also featured a piece on the possible POAL expansion program.

Linked below is the letter I sent to Council, the reply from ACIL, and my “reply” post to ACIL on VOAKL.

The Original Letter to Council calling for that Enquiry

The Reply from ACIL

My Reply on VOAKL to ACIL

For some light relief – check out Your Port Your Call on Facebook. Richard Horton does a nice impression on what we could do with POAL at its current location.

A Reply to my Letter about POAL

Auckland Council Investment Limited Replies

In February I had composed a letter asking five questions (two were mine and three from Andy Cawston) about the Port of Auckland and the current situations facing the port.

Today in my mail I had received a letter from Gary Swift – Chief Executive of Auckland Council Investment Limited (the Council Controlled Organisation responsible for “looking after” Port of Auckland’s affairs in the name and “benefit” of Auckland Council – on behalf of the ratepayers of Auckland) answering the five questions outlined in the original letter.

Thank you Mr Swift for your reply to the letter, very much appreciated. :)

Below is the embedded document containing the letter.

The answer to question five is the most interesting one and would be a matter of interest to those who are concerned about the Port of Auckland’s planned expansion in its current site. 

[Edit from voakl admin]. As in my comment below, ACIL believe an independent enquiry is not needed to look into the five questions asked (especially the ones in the comment box below) in my original letter. While unsurprising – this is deeply disappointing. Seems it is back to the drawing board on POAL  folks. Time to have a rethink on where next – do I push on with relocation draft workings, or give up and concede the port is going to expand where it is. OR money where my mouth is and run for Auckland Council next year on a platform (well part of a comprehensive wider platform) of getting the enquiry under way into those five questions – which could see the port moved. Because the port is sick and hamstrung folks it really is – and I do deeply believe a “second-opinion” is needed through the enquiry on POAL. So time for some options and thoughts – any from the reader out there?

I will be forming follow-up questions in due time as I prepare my presentation to the City Centre Master Plan, Waterfront Plan and submission Draft Long Term Plan. It seems the Return on Investment could be “blinding” ACIL and Auckland Council to what could be viable alternatives to POAL – that being relocation to south-east Auckland OR Marsden Point/Port of Tauranga. Still need to hold that enquiry folks – now more so than ever.

The reply from ACIL

From The NBR – POAL

NBR Calls for Container Terminal at POAL to Move

After reading a piece from Metro Magazine on Port of Auckland, I came across this piece from The National Business Review (NBR) also on Port of Auckland. Ok granted – the article was published last week but the relevance from Professor Tim Hazeldine (Economics – University of Auckland) is still there. You can read both pages in the embeds below but the article struck me on one account; third column of page two about half way down. I see a figure of ONE BILLION DOLLARS! That is the potential value of 50-hectares of land/real estate redevelopment if the container terminal at Port of Auckland was moved else where such as south-east Auckland as I advocate, or Marsden Point/Port of Tauranga combo that is also advocated by others.

$1,000,000,000 – wow. Look, I take it the land is and would be under the Auckland Council Investment Limited CCO (Council Controlled Organisation) if the land was redeveloped. So Auckland Council sits on a gold mine if it redevelopments the container terminal  - “gold” to help REINVEST in some other investments this city sorely needs.

Redevelopment the container terminal for both private (residential and commercial) and public (civic or “parks”) use and the money from the investment there could be used to:

  • Help pay for Port relocation to south-east Auckland (with the assistance of a POAL sell down (not privatised))
  • “Deposit” on the City Rail Link
  • Eastern Highway (as a 2-lane thoroughfare)
  • Infrastructure like water and waste water that needs upgrades
  • Pay off some debt
  • That pesky cruise ship terminal (with some change to spare)
  • Probably some deposits on some capital expenditure outlined in The Draft Long Term Plan

All the while Auckland Council gets; a nice “dividends” back on rents from the redevelopment for further investment, a connected waterfront for ALL to enjoy, trucks and freight trains off the inner roads and rail and a few other benefits of a relocated port. [Edit from admin] I forgot to mention as in the NBR article, Auckland gets a shot in the arm with residential supply being able to increase in the prime CBD area which seems to have chronic housing facility shortages at the moment (if rent and house buying bidding wars in Central Auckland are anything to go by)!

So – we run with an election pitch to get The Enquiry under way and see where to relocate OUR PORT OF AUCKLAND?

Your Port – Your Call folks – so get submitting to The Draft Long Term Plan – for our Port’s future

The NBR Article (Two embeds)