Keep tabs from time to time folks – it is worth it if you like to know Also Davis Avenue completion is late again(?) Auckland Transport have an easy … Continue reading Some Transport Projects
Keep tabs from time to time folks – it is worth it if you like to know Also Davis Avenue completion is late again(?) Auckland Transport have an easy … Continue reading Some Transport Projects
To mitigate against this Before I start the post I highly recommend reading the Stuff article first so you can get the context of this post. The Stuff article … Continue reading Why one should or should have submitted to the Unitary Plan
What was the biggest issue raised in the submissions Unsurprisingly it was zones and the Isthmus…. Last week I had posted that the Unitary Plan Committee agenda had … Continue reading The Unitary Plan Highlights [Updated]
Photos of Food Instead I was thinking about posting my commentary on the Queen Elizabeth Two square debate that cropped up on Thursday but though nah its planning and … Continue reading Planning and Politics Free Day
Interesting analysis here from Pete George
Right now Labour are doing absolutely nothing to attract my vote and I deem myself a well informed voter. Thus currently all things measured (good against the bad) I am likely to swing behind National this round.
However, what annoys me to great extent is the Opposition. We need an Opposition as our democratic system requires it. But when we have what I perceive as a piss weak opposition then I am concerns as it is not good for our democratic institutions
David Cunliffe has a number of political challenges. He inherited entrenched Labour problems that included a lack of obvious direction and authenticity. He seems to have embraced these flaws.
Cunliffe has evolved as leader but not for the better. He began with a favourable poll surge but has been waning and struggling since then. He keeps changing persona and it’s difficult to see the real Cunliffe. We got a glimpse in “At Home With The leader” on Campbell Live last week but he soon reverted to an overtrained poli-parrot persona.
His current approach is to recite talking points. These often include dubious repeated claims like ‘speculators don’t pay tax’ and corny lines like
In his budget speech Cunliffe accused the Government of “smoke and mirrors”. He should look in his own mirror.
This is obviously a “fudge-it Budget”.
Six Budgets and still no vision. As Michael Cullen would say, the…
View original post 1,099 more words
Final Step(s) before Submissions Round Starts (Again) While retrieving the Minutes for last Thursday’s Auckland Development Committee meeting (so I could get the Resolutions for an upcoming commentary piece) … Continue reading Unitary Plan Committee Agenda is Out
The Te Papa North – Manukau facility (to be located next to the MIT Campus on the south-western side of the Manukau City Centre) is advancing from the concept stages to now developing a business case for the facility.
From Voxy:
An innovative partnership approach between Te Papa and Auckland cultural agencies is redefining the proposal for a Manukau facility. The concept development is progressing to a second stage business case.
A development group with deep community roots has been tasked to define the project concept for the proposed National Centre for Collections, Education and Exhibitions.
The business case will incorporate Maori and Pacific dimensions, culture, science and heritage education and the potential to deliver a new vision in Manukau – the heart of New Zealand’s most culturally diverse and fastest growing region.
Evan Williams, Te Papa’s Chair says, “The National Centre presents an opportunity to present the very best of our Nation’s treasures and share our diverse arts, sciences, heritage and cultural collections through this collaborative partnership project. We are excited to work with our project partners and communities to further explore how we can create a national hub for a thriving programme of lifelong learning, exhibitions, events, community outreach, research and scholarship to reach local, regional and national communities.”
The Development Group includes community leaders, museum specialists, art practitioners, educators, cultural advocates, representatives from creative industries, alongside local iwi and cultural groups. This group will work with project partners Te Papa, Auckland War Memorial Museum, Auckland Council and the Ministry for Culture and Heritage to complete the project concept and case study.
“Auckland Museum looks forward to participating in continued discussions with colleague institutions to explore the possibilities for shared programmes and facilities. It makes sense to work together as there is common interest in delivering engaging experiences for audiences and communities across the Auckland region, and as an extension of the Museum’s existing collection-based outreach programmes,” says Roy Clare, Director of Auckland Museum.
The business case will be developed in the coming months. It will define fresh ways to work across museums and places of learning, in Manukau, Auckland Tamaki Makaurau and on a national scale.
—ends—
Source http://www.voxy.co.nz/national/proposed-national-centre-manukau-moves-forward/5/190556
Excellent that the facility is progressing to the business case stage. All willing and everything lined up we should see the facility up and ready by 2017-2018.
My last piece of Te Papa Manukau/North commentary was last year here: Why Te Papa North Should be In Manukau – NOT Wynyard Quarter
Takanini Interchange construction to be sped up As announced in yesterday’s Budget a $375 million interest-free loan has been extended to NZTA to accelerate a group of mainly … Continue reading Southern Auckland and Manukau – An Omnibus – Post Budget
Upgraded pretty much immediately if NZTA follow through I listened to pieces of the New Zealand Budget today which was a more tame affair than the Australian … Continue reading Takanini Interchange to be upgraded
This morning I was at the Auckland Development Committee listening in on the debate around what to do with Queen Elizabeth Square in downtown Auckland. The debate was pretty good although some not necessary outbursts did mar the overall quality of the debate. I take my hat off to Councillor Cameron Brewer who articulated the main points around the Square debate very well today – as did Councillor Fletcher. Hopefully Councillor Brewer will get one of his fabled releases out as it will be a good one to see (for once).
Full commentary will be up tomorrow but in the meantime from Auckland Council:
Auckland Council has agreed in principle to negotiate the sale of Queen Elizabeth Square to Precinct Properties New Zealand Ltd in return for proceeds being used to provide quality downtown public spaces.
The square and the Downtown Shopping Centre sit above the route of the twin rail tunnels that will form part of the city rail link.
Precinct Properties proposes major redevelopment of its shopping centre and surrounding properties which it owns.
Proceeds from the commercial sale of the 2000m2 public square could be used to develop an alternative public area, such as Admiralty Steps on the Quay street waterfront.
A plan by Precinct Properties for the comprehensive redevelopment of its property holdings in the area has also opened an opportunity to reintroduce aspects of historic Little Queen Street which was lost in earlier redevelopments.
Council staff believe Precinct Properties’ plans will also link with council proposals for the transformation of Quay Street waterfront.
“We are in the very early stages of proposals for this area,” said Deputy Mayor and Auckland Development Committee chair Councillor Penny Hulse. “With the city rail link tunnels running below Precinct Properties buildings, it makes sense to align the tunnel construction with the company’s development programme.
“Working with the company will produce the best outcome for all parties, including new public amenities at no cost to ratepayers.”
—ends—
Note that Queen Elizabeth Square has NOT been sold. However, the Council through today have made their intent known that they do wish to sell the Square back to the private sector.
A decision at the Auckland Development Committee in August will decide whether to actually sell the Square or not.
Full commentary tomorrow