Done and Dusted Yesterday I filed my submission to the Otara-Papatoetoe Area Plan. While at 63 pages I can reassure you it is not a heavy dense read … Continue reading Submission to the Otara-Papatoetoe Area Plan is Complete
Done and Dusted Yesterday I filed my submission to the Otara-Papatoetoe Area Plan. While at 63 pages I can reassure you it is not a heavy dense read … Continue reading Submission to the Otara-Papatoetoe Area Plan is Complete
Research Paper in Auckland’s Commute Patterns and Differences is Out The Ministry of Transport has released a paper into Auckland’s commute patterns as captured by the 2001, 2006 … Continue reading ‘Journey to Work Patterns in the Auckland Region’ Paper Out
Congratulations to S3 Architects – the winner of the NZIA & Ockham Residential's #Auckland design competition! — Auckland Council (@AklCouncil) August 12, 2014 Congratulations to s3 Architects for … Continue reading And the Winner of the Housing Design Competition in Mt Eden is?
Four developers believed to have walked away with more disgruntled The Housing Accord and the Special Housing Areas were meant to be a tool between Central Government and … Continue reading Special Housing Areas Already in Trouble?
‘No, I don’t know much about it, it’s Auckland Council’s plan not Auckland Transport’s plan’. I kid you not readers, I kid you not. That is what an … Continue reading Left Hand is Certainly Not Talking to the Right Hand in Regards to the City Rail Link [Updated]
Sorry to say but the final 5 just did not do it for me Update: Winner announced Congratulations to S3 Architects – the winner of the NZIA & Ockham … Continue reading Thoughts on the ‘Exhibition of medium density housing schemes’ [Update] WINNER ANNOUNCED
In Relation to Site Specific Changes, Regional Policy Statement, and Rural Urban Boundary Submissions This is an important one if you have submitted in relation to the following with … Continue reading Auckland Unitary Plan Hearing Panel Procedural Minute 6
No Direction yet but the meeting did happen (with a few other issues raised) Those other issues I will covered in a separate post that looks at the Hearing … Continue reading Follow Up on First Unitary Plan Pre-Hearing
Anything over 67% means a super-majority in either supporting or showing disapproval against a particular motion or project. In this instance looking at the presser I see 68% (so a Super Majority) are in favour of the Bayswater Marina project which has attracted the usual North Shore NIMBYism for the usual North Shore NIMBYism crowd.
From Scoop
A new survey by Colmar Brunton shows nearly 70 per cent of local residents want the proposed Bayswater Marina Village.
Sunday 27 July 2014, 10:30am
As well as terraced houses and low-level apartments, the Marina Village will include two public parks on the water’s edge with children’s playgrounds, cafes, retail and upgraded boating facilities and a new home for the Takapuna Grammar Rowing Club.
“We have had extensive consultation with the local communities around the Bayswater area and this new survey showing 68 per cent of residents in favour of the proposed Bayswater Marina Village is very encouraging,” said Marina owner Simon Herbert.
The key findings from the survey were:
1) Overall 70% of residents were aware of the proposed Bayswater Marina Village before the survey
2)The majority of residents were in favour of the following aspects of the development; improved access to the water (93%), public parks and playground (90%), and the new facilities and home for Takapuna Rowing Club (86%).
3)Overall, 68% of residents were in favour of the proposed Bayswater Marina Village.
“We’ve engaged positively with the local community and they told us that improved public access to the water was a high priority for the marine village. This will be achieved by the inclusion of board walks, concrete steps to the water and a north facing white sand beach,” said Mr Herbert.
“The village itself is designed to align itself with a marine environment and will include terraced housing and apartments using building materials such as timber board and batten, weatherboards and shingles.”
“While Bayswater Marina Village locals will be well serviced by public transport with an emphasis on using existing ferry and bus services, it will also offer visitors and tourists a new and exciting destination to travel to on Auckland’s harbour.”
—-
Background to the Poll
Colmar Brunton conducted a survey on behalf of Bayswater Marina Holdings Ltd to find out whether residents were in favour or, or against the proposed Bayswater Marina Village.
A total of n=322 telephone and online interviews were conducted with residents of Bayswater and surrounding suburbs of Belmont, Narrow Neck and Hauraki to assess the appeal of the development.
The data has been weighted to reflect the demographic profile of residents from the area bases on 2013 Census statistics.
The following explanation of Bayswater Marina Village was provided to all respondents:
———
Source: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK1407/S00555/overwhelming-support-for-bayswater-marina-village.htm
Providing the urban design aspects can be done well the project should give boost to an area which is either bare ground or surface parking.
No doubt we shall hear from the Gillon clan who reside on the North Shore with their NIMBY reaction to the poll. And it seems I didn’t have to wait particularly long as this came up:

While not from the Gillon’s you can see the resentment against the project there. Now Colmar Brunton are one of our big research and polling companies and a respected one at that with them carrying out the One News political polling. I am sceptical they would have conducted a poll that would have overt bias, inaccuracies and misrepresentations as such claimed by the person quoted in the said article. That said it will be see how the complaint is dealt with.
I might go follow-up with North Shore Ward Councillors Wood and Darby to see their views and thoughts on the Marina project.
An extract
NORTH SHORE LOCAL POLITICIANS IN FOR EAR BASHING
Via the Tipline
All is not well for a few of Auckland’s local body politicians. The team at WOBH has been hearing rumours from concerned parents increasingly frustrated by busy-bodies like ex-Alliance MP Grant Gillon and holier than thou Chris Darby.
Seems the parents and teachers of boys and girls at the Takapuna Grammar School Rowing are getting all fired up that certain NIMBYS are preventing the kids from getting a new rowing club.
The rowing club is currently housed in a building owned by Auckland Council. The problem they have is that it’s a building Auckland Transport is planning to bulldoze for a carpark for its new ferry building at Bayswater.
So the kids at the rowing club need a new home. Auckland Council actually has a bit of land that could be used nearby, but they (the kids/parents) will have to pony up with a truckload of cash to build a new building/clubroom costing hundreds of thousands.
…
Source: http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2014/08/north-shore-local-politicians-ear-bashing/
From Scoop
8 August 2014
Associate Local Government Minister Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga today announced a further step in the Government’s drive to reduce the cost of building new homes with the appointment of 26 commissioners to the Register of Development Contributions Commissioners.
“These commissioners will serve as a panel to ensure transparency and accountability in the charging of development contributions,” says Mr Lotu-Iiga.
“We are committed to making sure development contributions do not unnecessarily impact housing affordability.”
The appointments follow the passing of the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Act (No 3) 2014.
“The Act which comes into force today includes improvements to the development contributions regime, making them fairer and more transparent. This is part of a suite of housing affordability initiatives like increasing land supply, establishing Special Housing Areas, removing tariffs on building materials and reforming the Resource Management Act 1991,” says Mr Lotu-Iiga.
He adds that the development contributions commissioners will make sure that councils can only charge developers for infrastructure related directly to their developments. He says the commissioners will manage the new objections process as the law now allows developers to object to a council’s imposition of a development contribution charge.
“I am pleased with the calibre of people who put their names forward for the register. I am confident that the appointed commissioners possess the relevant knowledge, skills and expertise to serve on the panel.”
All the commissioners are appointed for a three-year term.
For more information about the development contributions objections process visitwww.dia.govt.nz/better-local-government
Commissioner biographies:
—-ends—-
Source: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1408/S00153/development-contributions-commissioners-appointed.htm
Something to ponder over before your next development