Councillors Some Questions to ask Auckland Transport On The Manukau North Rail Link Duplication As I had mentioned earlier in my “AUCKLAND TRANSPORT HAS A MOMENT” and … Continue reading Questions to Ask on the Manukau North Link
Everything else
Councillors Some Questions to ask Auckland Transport On The Manukau North Rail Link Duplication As I had mentioned earlier in my “AUCKLAND TRANSPORT HAS A MOMENT” and … Continue reading Questions to Ask on the Manukau North Link
While I was “fussing about” with transport matters this status came across my Facebook ticker. It is in relation to the “Hauraki Gulf Spatial Plan Project Steering Group” and how it passed on a split vote requiring the Chair – Deputy Mayor Penny Hulse to cast her casting vote to get the resolution through.
From Facebook – Michael Whybro’s Status (which was made under the “public” setting):
Ben Ross shared Michael Whybro‘s status.
Well seems someone got the names of the Councillors out who voted on the Hauraki Gulf Spatial Plan Project Steering GroupWhat a pure buggers muddle in voting patterns and what happened to theCommunities and Residents Caucusing here?
SHAME ON 11 AUCKLAND CITY COUNCILLORSDear Councillors,
Well the result of the vote is now known and available for all the see. We can now shine the light on those who actually believe in equality and fairness but equally we can out those who are actually clear cut supporters of inequality, reverse racism, placating the activist minorities and ignoring the best interests of the vast majority of their constituents!
Thank you to the following Councillors who voted in favour of Resolution number APC/2013/4 which would have prevented the effective stacking/take-over of a the very critical Hauraki Gulf Spatial Plan Project Steering Group by local Maori (Mana Whenua) at the expense of all other races, cultures and peoples of Auckland. Thanks for your support for the normally silent majority:
Cameron Brewer
Dr Cathy Casey
Sandra Coney
Hon Chris Fletcher
Mike Lee
Calum Penrose
Sharon Stewart
Sir John Walker
Wayne WalkerEqually, the following Councillors voted in favour of Maori control of this very important Project Steering Group. These councillors have signed off on the racial selection of a small, activist, minority group now controlling all proposals and recommendations on the future management of the entire Hauraki Gulf which is one of New Zealand’s top natural treasures! Let’s not pull our punches, these local Iwi represent way less than 15% of the total population of the Auckland/Hauraki region and yet they are now effectively in charge of its future management and/or development! Thanks for NOTHING to the following Councillors:
Anae Arthur Anae
Michael Goudie
Ann Hartley
Penny Hulse
Des Morrison
Richard Northey
Noelene Raffills
David Taipari
Patience Te Ao
Penny Webster
George WoodThe fact is that these 11 Councillors, including the Chair, believe that local Maori who represent less than 15% of Auckland/Hauraki citizens and ratepayers are MORE important than the other 85% of us and I’m afraid that I for one take this as a major discriminatory and racist slap in the face to upwards of 1,000,000 non-Maori New Zealanders! Shame on you all. You need to explain yourselves – not that I believe this is genuinely possible …. racism is racism and discrimination is discrimination!
We all await your responses.
Michael
We do await the response to this situation and how the hell this situation ended up in a pure buggers muddle in a voting split amongst the Centre-Left and Right political factions. As I said what happened to the Centre-Right’s much vaunting Caucus-ing and “whipping” of votes in critical regards such as this one.
I am not amused and I bet most of Auckland isn’t either…
AT Asks For Money FOR THE WRONG PROJECT… Yesterday I had mentioned my presentation and the results from that presentation to Auckland Transport yesterday: Returned from RPTP Panel … Continue reading Auckland Transport Has a Moment
Waitangi Day (our New Zealand National Day) has different meanings for everyone. For me on such a clear day like this it means I first of all pay homage to Britain then go out into the garden to tend to the crops. Yes folks and some would be aware, we grow our own veges and have chickens for some “home-grown” eggs.
So today I popped out into the back garden for “round one:” harvesting. Round Two: mowing the lawns and ripping out Ivy” will happen later this afternoon or tomorrow morning!
A selection of today’s harvest from the back garden. (A note that a mix of organic and synthetic fertilisers and sprays are used for the crops. However I am pleased to note that spraying have been reduced this year with a bumper crop harvest under way)
More later
Ben Ross : Auckland
Illustrating What I Get Up-To
More Than Just Auckland You Know 😉
Auckland Council have called for submissions to the Draft 2013/2014 Annual Plan – the main budgetary document for Auckland Council for the next 12 months. All revenue and expected expenses (including capital outlay for proposed capital projects) over this twelve month period are laid out in the Annual Plan documents which I shall link and embed below.
I am still working through the Draft Annual Plan at the moment before compiling a submission (submissions close 4pm – 25 February 2013) but will upload my submission to BR:AKL as soon as it is done.
It is of note that Council has asked for our feedback via the submissions on the “Regional Facilities Auckland grant towards development of the TelstraClear Pacific Events Centre” – which is building this White Water Rafting Facility at a cost to the ratepayer of $32m as well as taking on some financial risk if the project fails. In order for this development to happen (and as stated in the Draft Annual Plan) there will have to be an amendment to the 2012-2022 Long Term Plan which is already in operation. This would be because this particular development is calling on for extra funds made outside what has been allocated already in the existing and current Long Term Plan.
As a result I will be submitting in strong opposition to this as it creates precedent for every other Tom, Dick and Harry project with dubious actual economic merit to come before Council and thus allowing an existing LTP to be butchered to cater for it – when if needed, it should be kicked over to the next Long Term Plan which is the 2015-2025 LTP.
This is not how we budget for things anywhere – and I expect Council to follow the same standard. Besides I can think of better used to go and sink $32m such as cleaning up Otara Creek which is a toxic site or to our struggling Local Boards to fund local community facilities or events.
However I will run further commentary on this as I draw up my submission
In the mean time some links and documents
Draft annual plan 2013/2014 – Home Page
Draft annual plan 2013/2014 – Documents
Draft annual plan 2013/2014 – Key topics and events
Draft annual plan 2013/2014 – Draft Annual Plan 2013/2014: Have your say
VolumeOne of the Draft Annual Plan
Volume Two of the Draft Annual Plan
Volume Three of the Draft Annual Plan
(Yep another rates decrease coming my way)
Last December I had filed a Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act request into the business case study of the now Auckland Transport Ronwood Avenue Parking Building: LGOIMA REQUEST OUT – MANUKAU CAR PARK
Well today I joined up with Councillors George Wood, Sharon Stewart and Dick Quax for lunch and a quick look at the Manukau Rail Station as well as the Ronwood Avenue Parking Building. These are the photos I took:
The Manukau station is still as dead as a Do-Do and I am hearing reports that the MIT Building and/or ticket office on-top of the Manukau Station could open up to three months late as of current (So instead March we are looking at June at the earliest)
As for the AT Parking Building, oh boy not good. 456/671 spaces available (32% full) and the on-street parking which has cheaper Park and Display All-Day parking was only 67% full. To make things more interesting the signs at the entrance of the building gave an incorrect count. The entrance displayed 35 spaces available while the counter on Deck Two displayed 456 spaces available – so it is a case of which one is it. The fire exit door on Deck I think Six was locked so you could not go in out of it from that level while the entire Ground Level set aside for long-term lease holders was empty. And for the real head turner – AT dropped the ALL-DAY charge in the parking building from $19/day to $6/day, with the on-street parking still at I believe $4.50/day…
Heck I hope for revenue sake that the MIT opening and operation will fill up the car parking building other wise it is a truly dead duck. However we are also trying to encourage the students and staff to use public transport (hence MIT being right on top of the Manukau Station) so a conflicting situation here folks. Does AT encourage public transport to a dead station or private transport to a dead parking building?
A real head scratcher there folks…
Thursday 7th February at 1400 hours – Manukau Civic Centre I give my presentation to the Regional Public Transport Plan submission I wrote last year. I have finally completed the presentation for the four panel members which includes Councillor Mike Lee and AT’s Head of Public Transport Operations – Mark Lambert, with the main focus being local. That is the focus is close to home and covers the Manurewa, Takanini, Manukau and Papakura areas (I live in Papakura).
The presentation in PDF format is embedded below:
The speaking slot is only 10 minutes however if the panel members have read my written submission already AND paid some attention to the blog where most of the presentation material has come from, then the bulk of the speaking session should be a dialogue between myself and the panel members as they flesh out the points I have made. Not spending time going over the entire submission as our AT panel members should have already read it (the presentation basically is a refresher with some graphics thrown in to illustrate points).
Now being the Social Liberal that I am and having declared earlier that I am sensitive to price and time consideration when choosing a mode of transit, we shall take a look at the options I have to get me from Papakura to Manukau.
To go by car to Manukau
Using the motorways it would take 15 minutes to travel the 11.1km trip – this is one way. As parking is free the main cost is petrol so I would say $3 for the return trip
According to the AT Journey Planner
Not even an option as the train into Manukau Station either at 1:04pm or 2:05 pm – so missing the market entirely as I would need to catch the 12:40pm service from Papakura and relay with the Britomart – Manukau train service at Puhinui at 12:56pm. Cost if I did decide to do this is $1 to the Park and Ride at Papakura and a $3 – 2-stage fare using my AT-HOP card (approx).
For the trip home providing I was not held up I would catch the 14:31 service from Manukau to Puhinui and relay with the 14:46 Eastern Line train heading to Papakura which gets in at Papakura at 15:03pm. Again cost is the same as the trip into Manukau
Not my first choice however I do have the following: Route 472 (so a Great South Road trundler) departing at 12:50pm and getting me to Manukau Mall at 13:15pm. Cost is $3.40 – two stage. Now the actual time consumer is the walk from the Manukau bus stop to the Civic Centre which takes another 10 minutes. So providing the bus was not late I would arrive at the Civic centre at 13:30 give or take.
Trip home would entail the following: Bus leaving (again the 472) 14:45 and getting to Papakura at 15:15 with the fare being $3.40.
So $3 and 25 minutes by car for the return trip, or over an hour and costing $8 approx for using a bus (trains do not even get a mention as the time is just too excessive to consider unless I really want to time waste).
I think CAR is the preferred choice for my trip to and from Manukau on Thursday; based on cost, efficiency and time. It shouldn’t be the case but it is – and now you can see why I am submitting to the RPTP so this situation should not happen!
Rather ironic isn’t it?
A good start and with full potential to become something great. As Louis said need to work on Zonal and Cheaper Fares to get this work better
(as of off peak – one step at a time)
Central Government last year passed the Sale and Supply Alcohol Act which gives Council and Local Board increased authority and delegation on how alcohol (a demerit good) is sold and supplied in local communities.
Councillor George Wood has been made chairman of a working party (as noted in his Facebook status below) of members Auckland Council and Local Board to begin the slow and long process in getting ready to set up a Local Alcohol Policy or LAP:
George Wood shared a link.
Auckland Council starts long process to prepare local alcohol policy. I’m chairman of the working party along w/ 7 Crs and 7 LB members.
George also Scribd‘ed a fact sheet on Part One in developing such a LAP:
So as alluded to Part One is developing a Draft Local Alcohol Policy before step two kicks off which is: consultation
BR:AKL will keep an eye on Councillor Wood’s working party as it begins drawing up a Draft LAP and see where this new direction in alcohol policy goes for Auckland and its Local Boards
Some feedback from a reader (who has asked to remain anonymous which BR:AKL will do as requested) on their experience with our rail system down at Britomart over the recent Auckland Anniversary Weekend:
Made a big mistake yesterday. I showed some international investors around the waterfront yesterday knowing it would be vibrant with Anniversary day regatta on. All was well until they wanted to go see our train station (which was Britomart). What a “disaster” that turned out to be.
They stood there for about 5-10min taking it all in, watching as the same people were at the ticket box with one person working (at that particular ticket box (The station platform level one on the other side of the gates where the “Onboard Fare is usually paid)) trying to sort something out for five minutes. As a result people were coming and going from the waiting queue annoyed.
The investors were not impressed at all and said that what they seen of Auckland doesn’t impress them as a viable city to invest in. They said love the wide open spaces, weather etc. but just doesn’t stack up as commercially viable.
While I am here: Every time I go into Station Square in Newmarket to show potential investors/tenants the vacant shops I pray there are humans (besides the unemployed and school kids hanging around during school hours I might pray but the poor tenants are mental wrecks waiting for the last four years for the trains to arrive every thee minutes and what was it like 17,000 people using that station.
Well after another anonymous reader fed to the blog some statistics from the Anniversary Weekend I am not surprised that our friend above was rather disheartened and the investors spooked off.
The statistics I am referring to is how many Rail Ticket Machines had some kind of fault in them. 37 faults on 31 machines out of an approximate total of 57 rail ticket machines across the Auckland rail network over the long weekend. The faults can range from:
So 31 out of 57 machines had either one or more of the above listed faults in the weekend. To make it worse, if you call it in to the AT-HOP help desk the technician won’t come until Tuesday to “fix” the issue (I kid you not).
Now to make life harder, those with AT-HOP cards who would tag on and off like I do when travelling by train would have faced numerous tagging posts “offline” meaning you need to go find another tag post. I knew of a couple of stations (I went travelling on the train in the weekend “exploring”) that had two out of three of their tag posts offline. Again call it into AT-HOP help desk and the technician comes out Tuesday.
What on earth happened over the Anniversary weekend when Auckland had all the tourists in. I thought we were meant to make our good train system that – good; not bloody difficult and spooking off people.
Groan – the amount of work to advance the good system into an Advanced First-Class system just keeps piling up and up and up with no light at the end of the tunnel.
Come on guys – I know you can do better 😦