Question for the readers out there In my Manukau City Centre Southern End – Renewal post I had showcased the stitching together of two mock up’s I had done at the … Continue reading Question: Park or Tower?
An issue causing hot discussion either here in the blog or in the wider community
Question for the readers out there In my Manukau City Centre Southern End – Renewal post I had showcased the stitching together of two mock up’s I had done at the … Continue reading Question: Park or Tower?
Still Missing a Planning Minister though Labour have been watching Auckland Council as the Council goes through the motions of setting up a new Council Controlled Organisation to … Continue reading Labour Wants Development Companies
32% Valuation Rise does not mean a 32% rates rise By now you would have seen the increased chatter around the new Council Valuations on property around Auckland … Continue reading Rates and your Council Vaulations [Updated]
Because they do not look like they are being spent in Addison When I wrote the Updates on Takanini-Addison Area post I had a few questions come in about where the … Continue reading Where have the Development Contributions from Addison Gone?
Combined Letter Sent I saw this yesterday come across Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarveySpectre_/status/522945585679056896 I thought to myself what is this all about and so I opened the link which lead to … Continue reading Local Boards Fire Shot Over Mayor’s Bow
Also Council to consider setting up a new Council Controlled Organisation And so yesterday I gave the abridged version of my presentation to the Auckland Development Committee. The main … Continue reading The Reaction To My Presentation to the Auckland Development Committee [Updated with figures and links]
After quite a few Memorandum for Counsel letters appearing (see: Developments from the Unitary Plan Hearings ) the Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel is working through things to simplify the processes.
From the Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel:
Help is at hand for submitters to the Auckland Unitary Plan hearings who are having difficulties understanding and navigating the hearings process.
The Independent Hearings Panel considering the more than 9500 submissions – and a further 3500 further submissions – says it’s important that the process encourages everyone to be involved.
One misconception is that submitters can only take part in the hearings process if they have legal counsel, expert witnesses and evidence.
The chair of the Independent Hearings Panel, Judge David Kirkpatrick, said this most definitely is not the case and while this was explained in documents on the Panel’s website, it needs to be highlighted.
“Some feedback is highlighting the complexity of the process and the difficulties some members of the public are having getting to grips with the key information so we are addressing that immediately,” said Judge Kirkpatrick.
“We want it to be as simple as possible for submitters to participate.
“The Unitary Plan process is big and complicated – it’s a complete review of the regional policy statement, four regional plans and seven district plans – but submitters can keep it relatively simple if they want to.”
Judge Kirkpatrick said Panel staff are:
This will all be available by the end of October.
The first Drop In clinic is at the Panel’s offices in central Auckland, another is being planned for Orewa and more will be organised around the region if there is demand.
The Panel may also consider holding a number of hearings outside of central Auckland and, possibly, outside normal working hours once more locally specific topics are being considered.
“It’s early days in a two-year process and as submitters get more used to the process and we make improvements, it will be much less daunting than some people have found it to be,” said Judge Kirkpatrick.
Panel staff are available to help submitters with questions and guidance through contact at info@aupihp.govt.nz or 09 979 5566
……….
This is a start. The Litmus Test will be the Regional Policy Statement, and the Rural Urban Boundary submissions working their way through the Hearings Panel now (where also the most anguish around the complexity of the Hearings process occurred as well).
I am not due to present and give my submission until next year.
For your reading Source: Auckland Council Tomorrow I give my presentation in the Public Input section of the Auckland Development Committee tomorrow at Town Hall. You can see the agenda … Continue reading Presentation for October Auckland Development Committee Up
I have seen this from Local Board Chair Peter Haynes in regards to a motion Councillor Cathy Casey put forward at the Unitary Plan Committee today:
I have noted from a couple of Procedural Minutes from the Independent Hearing Panel for the Unitary Plan as well as the Committee Agenda (see: website down so will get the link when it is back up) that the Council nor the Hearings Panel are particular interested in making resources available to submitting groups so that they can front the Hearings Panel better equipped. Furthermore the Minister for the Environment has refused access to those resources as well.
It definitely seems so after my previous Unitary Plan Hearings Already Into Trouble? first pointed it out.
Or both North Shore Councillor George Wood stirred the pot again favouring bus over rail in his usual ‘Bus or Rail’ pieces often seen floating around Twitter and … Continue reading Train or Bus