Sir Bob Harvey tells lower North Island of amalgamation “benefits” I saw this one pop up thanks to Councillor Cathy Casey. From The Wairarapa Times: Two super-city meetings next … Continue reading Really Bob?
A News Post on something that has happened
Sir Bob Harvey tells lower North Island of amalgamation “benefits” I saw this one pop up thanks to Councillor Cathy Casey. From The Wairarapa Times: Two super-city meetings next … Continue reading Really Bob?
Rescinding Motion To Be In Play As noted last week the Auckland Development Committee resolved by 9-8 in a closed session to take the position that Port of Auckland … Continue reading UPDATE: Auckland Development Committee to Reconvene Over Port Issue On February 26
Still an ill-considered decision While Auckland Transport did get back to me around Te Mahia Station (basically wait four weeks for a public announcement), Manurewa Local Board have jumped … Continue reading Local Board Jumps the Gun on Te Mahia Station
Let the Unitary Plan Panel do its job Councillor North Shore Councillor Chris Darby seems to be channelling Joel Cayford in hamstringing Port of Auckland to which would have effects … Continue reading I Wonder If Councillor Darby Is Aware Of The Risks?
Marsden Wharf Demolition STARTS From the Mayoral Office Mayor asks ports to explain Mayor Len Brown says he is disappointed Ports of Auckland failed to inform Auckland Council … Continue reading Mayor Issues Please Explain to Port of Auckland
We have the Building Code for a reason And that is so people do not get hurt like those in the September deck collapse in Te Atatu. From Auckland … Continue reading It Pays to Comply
Mindset needs to change The accident involving three children and a car was that – an accident and most likely a freak one at that. I feel for both … Continue reading A City That Is Equitable to All our Citizens
Did you submit to the Unitary Plan on the Port? I see the Herald is continuing some fearmongering stories over the Port’s Bledisole Wharf situation after the Port gained … Continue reading Port Issues
Finance Papers out They must have done it either very late Friday or over the weekend but Auckland Council has released the Finance and Performance Committee Agenda for this … Continue reading Council to Post Six Month OPEX Surplus of $695m
In what is one of the largest fines under the Resource Management Act a company was fined over $100,000 plus costs for allowing dye to enter waterways and harm wildlife.
From Auckland Council:
An Auckland company is paying a heavy price for causing Auckland’s most destructive freshwater and marine pollution incident in decades.
Jenners Worldwide Freight, a freight forwarding company, has been fined $103,000, and ordered to pay $25,000 costs, after being found guilty at the Auckland District Court of spilling over 1000 litres of purple dye into the Oruarangi Stream and Estuary and the Manukau Harbour in South Auckland.
The dye spill in July 2013 killed all eels and fish in the stream, just under half of the mud snails and other species in the estuary. It drastically affected various oysters beds in the area with many oysters being killed. Fishing was banned in the area for months.
In sentencing Jenners, Judge Harland said “It is a fundamental responsibility of any person in any management position to understand and appreciate the workplace risks and the wider risks associated with any activities that are conducted within the business which they manage.”
She added: “The failure by management to even appreciate that there was a relevant rule in a plan that applied to them was also remarkable.”
Auckland Council Resource Consents Compliance Manager, Stefan Naude, said that this prosecution and the level of the fine makes it clear to business owners and managers that they must find out what their obligations are under the Resource Management Act and other relevant regulations, and comply with those obligations.
“In this case, if the container had been stored in a secondary containment device, at minimal cost, as required by the regulations, the discharge of the dye could have been prevented.”
The fine took into account the defendant’s previous good record, guilty plea and remorse.
—-ends—-
Pictures and actual judgement will be posted here later