All for the villas going and new mid rise apartments being built in their place I see the Herald has picked up on complaints are a set of dilapidated Victorian villas … Continue reading When Building Something New Actually Adds Character
Build Cycle Lane, then spend US$740,000 to rip it back out thanks to NIMBY’s
I caught this over at Streetblog USA earlier this morning in regards to what happens when NIMBY’s win. Pretty much a heart wrench to anyone who believes in a progressive city with progressive type infrastructure being built after near exhaustive studies were in support for the cycle lane.
An extract from Streetblog USA:
San Antonio to Tear Out the “Best Thing” City Has Done for Cycling
Score one for the NIMBY crowd in San Antonio.
City Council representatives have voted 10-1 to remove 2.3 miles of bike lanes on South Flores Street, which the local blog Bike San Antonio says is one of the few cases where the city put a bike lane “where one needs to be.” Council members apparently caved to nearby residents who claimed the bike lane caused traffic delays and complained about receiving insufficient notice of the changes.
The restriping of the two-way road, done during a resurfacing project, changed the configuration from four general traffic lanes to two, plus a center turn lane and bike lanes. City traffic studies found that the bike lanes caused no impediment to motor vehicle traffic, while crashes declined somewhat. But that apparently wasn’t good enough for the majority of council, including Rebecca Viagran, who represents most of the area with the bike lanes.
The San Antonio Express-News editorial board said the decision was shortsighted and disappointing:
What we’re looking at is a failure of leadership from council, particularly from Viagran.
Not only is it a monumental waste of money to appease a small group of overreactive residents, but it also flies in the face of stated city goals to improve bike infrastructure, the urban core and promote better health.
You can read the rest over at StreetBlog USA.
Not to worry we have similar issues with the Unitary Plan grinding its way through the next round (the Independent Hearings Panel) soon.
Bill English serves a reminder to Councils on Development Controls Earlier this week Minister of Finance Bill English gave a pre-Budget speech to the Wellington Employers’ Chamber of … Continue reading Minister of Finance Weighing in on Development Controls
A Theory Behind our Resident NIMBY’s NIMBY’s, love them or detest them they are always going to be there when it comes to Planning. Our most classic … Continue reading NIMBY’s
Auckland is not the only one with planning battles on its hands It seems Sydney is going through the same NIMBY problems Auckland is going through when an … Continue reading Sydney has its NIMBY’s Too
2013 in Reflection December marks the second anniversary of Talking Auckland. As I reflect back on 2013 I come to realise that it has been a very busy … Continue reading Second Anniversary for Talking Auckland
Always someone having a moan! I have noticed that opposition has cropped up over the Wesley Special Housing Area – recently announced by the Government and Auckland Council. I … Continue reading NIMBY’s In Wesley
Conditions becoming favourable for more Medium Density Residential Developments. From Transport Blog’s Bayswater and Alexandra Park developments post from earlier today: Bayswater and Alexandra Park developments By Matt L, … Continue reading More Medium Density Developments on the Way
If the NIMBY‘s Can Mobilise – So Can We I believe I can say what started as all happy and keen at the Council Unitary Plan media briefing on … Continue reading The Need for an Alliance – to Progress Auckland
Wave of Positive News for an Area that often gets downtrodden on by other parts of the City I picked up this real nugget of a gem this evening … Continue reading South Auckland – The Rising Jewel in Auckland’s Crown