Draft Unitary Plan Has a Date

WITH THE SHREDDER – IF I HAD MY WAY!

Deputy Mayor and in-charge of overseeing the development of The Unitary Plan – Penny Hulse released a photo and comment (which was made in Public mode) on The Draft Unitary Plan thus far before it is released in March for OUR feedback!

From Facebook:

500 pages – hmmm 406 pages to “remove” to get the Unitary Plan back down to “efficient” size

 

Kerry brought through the very first copy of the draft draft Unitary plan in preparation for the working party meeting on Friday…..just a light read!!!! huge thanks to our wonderful staff who have finally got this copy together and now we need to work this through with the rest of the elected members and get it ready for release in March. This feels like a huge step, now to get it into a form that the community can really engage with.

I’ll say it again: “500 pages? That makes it either as thick or thicker than our largest Bible in the house https://voakl.net/2012/10/19/unitary-plan-as-thick-as-a-brick/”

If you think it is a good idea to have a plan that sets out the planning rules as well as social controls upon the population that is thick as a large Bible then I am sorry you need your head read seriously!

And my reply to this comment Deputy Mayor: “now to get it into a form that the community can really engage with.” is to send the Plan to a shredder and send 404 pages from that Draft Unitary Plan down that shredder so we are left with just a nice and simple 94 pages for reading and submitting on. Because no way in living day-lights is an average business or resident going to go through 500 pages of rules and controls that are most likely no in plain Queens English (so full of technical jargon), try and get their head around it, and submit back to Council on it. It was bad enough The Auckland and Long Term Plans were uber long and most people struggled to get through it in order to put in a meaningful submission! Only our council planners and large-scale consultants would be able to “grasp” this brick of a Plan (seeming they wrote it or partake in helping to write it) – which is of still no use to the average ratepayer as WE need to understand it…

Wait 500 pages? Wait that is one ream of standard A4 sized printer paper. Let me compare one ream of A4 paper to our largest Bible in the house to get a comparison on depth and height of the Draft Unitary Plan:

So for our Deputy Mayor and the entire planning department in Auckland Council, I am going to report my Unitary Plan as Thick as a Brick post to remind you on the actual expectations of The Unitary Plan: 94 pages long!

UNITARY PLAN AS THICK AS A BRICK

 

Posted by BR:AKL_Admin01 on October 19, 2012 · 

 

Unitary Plan On the Path to Already Fail

 

To quote me from Facebook:

“When the Unitary Plan appears to be thicker than your average Bible at home, you know there is something VERY wrong here – with our planners and planning process…”

Now hopefully that is not true; but after I asked this morning in Facebook to those who have seen the Unitary Plan in its preliminary stages, I am rather not looking forward to seeing the Unitary Plan thus far hopefully next week. The actual answer to my question on the thickness was this: “it’s so thick it’s stupid,” so confidence in the Unitary Plan has already gone down the toilet – cute…

Yesterday in my K.I.S.S post I said this in regards on the Unitary Plan and simplicity:

The Late Owen McShane taught me that any “plan” over a thumbnail in thickness (on A4 paper – no cheating with A3) is a: dead weight, too complex, and albatross around the city and ratepayers neck. I would be a case of Gin that the Unitary Plan is going to be thicker than my thumbnail to the point it is going to be thick as my fist (yes that means the plan makes a fist of things). The K.I.S.S rule needs applied to the unitary plan, but to do that in benefit of the city, 3/4 of our bureaucratic and Stalinist Planning Department in Council would be all out of a job. Maybe that might be a good thing?

Thumbnail in thickness being the absolute maximum that ANY operating plan should be! Well it seems the Unitary Plan is going to fail that little test so I devised some crude measurements here.

I measured the thickness of thickest and largest Bible in the house; the NIV Life Application Bible standing at 48mm (4.8cm) and some 2385 pages in thickness. I also measured the thickness of my thumbnail which stood at 18mm (1.8cm) which means in theory the Unitary Plan using A4 paper (A3 for any maps – I’ll be generous there) should not be thicker than 20mm (2.0cm) at the absolute maximum. However again that does not seem likely.

 

So lets take a look at some pictures (and yes they are crude) for reference to thicknesses here folks:

Thickness of the NIV Life Application Bible stands at 4.8cm or 2385 pages. It is believed at around A3 paper size in average for the paper used, the Unitary Plan stands as thick as this Bible.

My Submission to The Auckland Plan using A4 paper. It stood at 58 pages and 0.5cm (5mm) thick

Combining both my submissions to The Auckland Plan (5mm – 58 pages) and the Long Term Plan (40 pages – 4mm approx on A4) giving a total thickness of 9mm or 94 pages

Thumbnail thickness at 18mm thick

9mm or 94 pages at A4 paper size is the thickness of both my submissions. That equates to half a thumbnail

 

9mm (94 pages) in thickness (or half a thumbnail) when both my submissions to the Auckland and Long Term Plans are combined. With 18mm being the thickness of my thumbnail (make it 20mm for a tolerance factor) and applying the K.I.S.S rule quoted above, the Unitary Plan should not be longer than 200 pages or both my submissions doubled up in thickness. But no we are seriously looking at a massive behemoth that is looking to be as thick as our largest Bible at home.

Heavens sake what is wrong with our planners – do they not understand thrift and simplicity? Obviously not or I would not be writing this post.

 

However I have some good news folks for all those who like simplicity, efficiency and wanting Council and planners to get the heck out of the our lives (and the road too). I am off to the “Civic Forum to discuss the Auckland Unitary Plan” on Tuesday 23 October and Saturday 27 October at Auckland Town Hall. So ideas abound once I get my first glimpse of this Unitary Plan. And yes I shall endeavour to “shrink” the Unitary Plan so it is no thicker than one’s thumbnail in the line of two of my eight fundamentals for a Better Auckland:

• Strong but no interfering Governance: Meaning Council  shows active and real leadership but does not interfere with the daily lives of residents and businesses
• Stay out of my way: I believe in the following strongly “Individual Freedom -> Individual Choice -> Individual Responsibility (oh and do not forget the consequences)”   I am an adult who can make choices for myself (whether it was right or wrong), treat me as such rather than a child.

 

So lets hope that at this Civic Forum this crucial fundamental will apply:

• Listen and Engage: God gave us two ears and one mouth. In my line of work you actively listen with both ears THEN engage in dialogue with your one mouth. Not the other way around as that is usually monologue and the fastest way to get your ears clipped. Same applies to civic institutions:  you actively listen with both ears THEN engage in dialogue with your one mouth unless you like getting your ears clipped… Oh and remember some days all the person wants you to do is JUST LISTEN to their little piece – as all we want some days is just to get it off our chests.

Dialogue not monologue (from the bureaucrats and Councillors)!

 

BR:AKL will run commentary as I attend this Civic Forum on the Unitary Plan and the outcomes from it.

 

Stay tuned as I strive for you a Better Auckland – and hoping like anything the Unitary Plan does not become as thick or thicker than my Bible as that would be really thick!

 

BEN ROSS : AUCKLAND