Councillor – Local Board Chair Relationship Deteriorates Over Te Mahia Station #Auckland2016

Manurewa Local Board not fulfilling their end of the deal over station

 

Yet another breakdown in the relationship between Manurewa-Papakura Councillor Calum Penrose and Manurewa Local Board Chair Angela Dalton has flared up into the media again.

From the Manukau Courier:

Funding for Manurewa’s Te Mahia train station in the spotlight

Manurewa-Papakura ward councillor Calum Penrose says the Manurewa Local Board should put money into upgrading Te Mahia ...
Chris Harrowell Manurewa-Papakura ward councillor Calum Penrose says the Manurewa Local Board should put money into upgrading Te Mahia train station. Source: Manukau Courier (7/4/2016)
 Local body politicians are butting heads over who should fund improvements to a train station.

Manurewa-Papakura ward councillor Calum Penrose has criticised the Manurewa Local Board’s decision to spend $1.5 million on a covered walkway from Southmall shopping centre to Manurewa railway station rather than investing in the Te Mahia train station.

Local board chairwoman Angela Dalton and member George Hawkins have publicly expressed their frustration (Manukau Courier, March 29) at what they say is a lack of action by Auckland Transport to improve Te Mahia station. Their main concerns are around lighting and security at the facility.

Penrose says the local board campaigned on making Te Mahia a top priority and “throwing money at it”.

“The board has $2.5m unspent in its Regional Land Transport Programme budget.

“I can’t understand why they’re making it a priority to build a covered walkway which is on private land. They should go to Auckland Transport and say ‘we will put some skin in the game and put $1m into improving it [Te Mahia]’.

“But they want Auckland Transport to do everything.”

Penrose says Te Mahia has low patronage numbers and is therefore not as high a priority for upgrades as busier stations with more pressing security issues.

Lighting has been installed at Te Mahia and he’s working with the Manukau Beautification Trust to “tidy it up”.

“I would have thought Te Mahia would be the board’s priority. That’s what they campaigned on. They put something in, AT puts something in, it’s a win-win.”

Penrose says the station is covered by monitored CCTV cameras, its platform is lit to AT’s standards and the facility is patrolled by security guards.

“It has a public address system through which AT’s control room can speak directly to people on the platform. AT also liaises daily with police through its operations centre, assessing threats and managing issues on the network.

“Lights are being installed in the walkway that runs from Ferguson St to the station and contractors are still confirming details of the lighting that will be installed in the walkway that runs from Great South Rd.”

SERVICES ‘NEGLECTED’

Manurewa Local Board chairwoman Angela Dalton says the Manurewa Action Team campaigned to keep Te Mahia train station open in 2013 as it was then under threat of closure.

“That immediate threat has now passed but that doesn’t preclude Auckland Transport from funding improvements, particularly given that residential ratepayers in Greenmeadows are being charged a $114 per year transport levy courtesy of a 9.5 per cent rate increase councillor Penrose voted for.”

Dalton says it is not the board’s responsibility to “back-fund” Auckland Transport’s and Auckland Council’s “neglect of core public services”.

“AT’s publicly stated priority is to improve public safety at its suburban train stations. Councillor Penrose campaigned on a platform to improve public safety.

“Until he and AT ensure a meaningful regional investment in Te Mahia station, such assurances are worthless.”

Dalton says her board does not have discretionary access to the Regional Land Transport Programme budget, as Penrose suggests, and nor does it have $2.5 million that could be spent on Te Mahia.

“Councillor Penrose should firstly read the local board plan, meeting agendas and minutes before speculating on its priorities and available budgets.

“Secondly, he should ensure the budget cuts to Te Mahia station adopted by Auckland Transport are reversed immediately.”

…………

Source: http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/manukau-courier/78530659/funding-for-manurewas-te-mahia-train-station-in-the-spotlight

 

Before I go on there was this from Auckland Transport in direct reply to Ms Dalton’s accusations:

Auckland Transport responds to Manurewa Local Board Chair over Te mahia Station http://manukaucourier.realviewdigital.com/#folio=6
Auckland Transport responds to Manurewa Local Board Chair over Te mahia Station http://manukaucourier.realviewdigital.com/#folio=6

 

Ouch.

To attract an Auckland Transport reply is one thing, to attract that reply in a newspaper from the head of Communications is something else entirely! Even though Auckland Transport and I have the odd ding-dong standing them up over meetings (which is what Dalton did) is a big no-no! For one that is unprofessional, second it mucks them around, third and most of all when you put an information request in you probably don’t want it denied.

 

I have heard from sources that the relationship between Dalton and her faction of the Manurewa Local Board has broken down with our Ward Councillor and the staff of both Council and the Council Controlled Organisations like Auckland Transport. That breakdown does not serve Manurewa well and nor can we risk that breakdown spreading into the Papakura Local Board area as well especially with elections at the end of the year.

 

Positive relationships even in times of disagreement between elected representatives and staff is absolute paramount. It is a thing called professional respect. Something I follow as an advocate and commentator in my relationship with the Council family and something I would maintain if elected to Papakura Local Board. Even if I think Te Mahia Station should be closed there are ways of reaching agreements over a locally hot button issues and there are ways in not dealing it as the Manurewa Local Board Chair is demonstrating quite spectacularly in the article and subsequent response from Auckland Transport.

 

I feel for the community of Manurewa.

 

Te Mahia replacements annotated

 

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Councillor – Local Board Chair Relationship Deteriorates Over Te Mahia Station #Auckland2016

  1. Shouldn’t we be considering closing Taki & Te Mahia stations anyway as they are not fit for purpose with all the development

    replacing them with

    Glenora Train Station & Spartan Road Train Station while at the same time removing all those level crossings which mean that most of the level crossings on the Southern would be gone except Penrose/Westfield?

  2. Ben, it’s purely and simply indicative of attack politics to fire random (unsubstantiated) attacks at perceived opponents. It’s quite open that Angela Dalton and Daniel Newman have been actively campaigning for some time now, they have even garnered support from George Hawkins in their self-aggrandizing campaign style. Simply not necessary and not constructive to behave in this manner.
    As for the Papakura Local Board, there have been unground rumblings for some time now with a challenging ticket being put together by at least one sitting member and supporting the Dalton, Newman cabal. At least the challenge is being done with some semblance of decorum and any campaigning has so far been positive. We see enough of attack politics at a national level, local politics should be purely and simply about representing people instead of party ideals.

    1. What we saw in the Courier will only escalate as we draw closer to the elections in October.

      I am aware of an opposition ticket standing down here as well as legislation making its way through the House preventing people standing for more than one Local Board.

      The objective of campaigning down here will be to keep it all positive while keeping one eye on the mayoral candidates.

      To the matter at hand though, a poor relationship with the wider organisations including AT does no one any favours at all. And if that poor behaviour is going to continue then a push for fresh representation is going to be needed.

      1. Personally I think these Local Boards are no better than the Rotten Borough’s. They are about as representative of the Auckland community than the Shire Knights that used to control the Commons in the post Civil War period.

Comments are closed.