Urban Geography can teach us a lot on how to work with Southern Auckland
Manukau Ward Councillor
An opening excerpt can be read below:
If a fuel tax is the best way to fund Auckland’s development, Councillor Efeso Collins asks that the benefits be invested in the people the tax will affect most – those in his Manukau ward. My parents worked on factory floors at NZ Forest Products in Penrose, cleaning operating theatres of Middlemore…
My main comment to Councillor Collins’s piece is the following:
The Congestion Free Network 2.0 makes a marked improvement but Council is not following this up with decent spatial planning nor is Auckland Transport supporting as they strip out evening bus services for our shift workers.
Looking at the story of The Tale of the Two Cities currently being aired on Newshub and Stuff Auckland Council carries a lot of the “flak” for the issues the South faces – more so than Central Government whether it be National or Labour.
The day Auckland Council, Auckland Transport and its planners learn Auckland is not designed for a mono-centric Core with all transport spines radiating out it, and that Auckland is effectively three distinct sub-regions (the Central and West, North and South) is the day we “solve” 99% of the problems of inequity faced in The South.
The South has no resemblance and little connection to the Isthmus and City Centre and for some reason our planning forgets about our heavy industrial complexes – of which the Airport complex is the second largest but fastest growing employment hub in Auckland.
The South is also the largest sub-region and fastest growing sub-region as well:
A lot of work is needed for the South that is certain. However, one area I might disagree with Councillor Collins is the Fuel Tax.
We either take the tax to allow $4 billion worth of investment that includes Mill Road and stage 1 of the Southern Airport Line or we don’t and continue to be stuck in even worse traffic.
A pure Catch-22!