Onto the nuts and bolts of the matter From the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel Hearings set to tackle strategic growth planning issues The critical planning issues … Continue reading Unitary Plan Hearings Advance
Onto the nuts and bolts of the matter From the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel Hearings set to tackle strategic growth planning issues The critical planning issues … Continue reading Unitary Plan Hearings Advance
This time I talk Manukau land sales, and transport funding Recently I was on location in Manukau City Centre being interviewed on both the recent decision by the … Continue reading Transport Funding Dead in the Water?
All About Auckland Looks at the Debate The All About Auckland Show has been covering the Valuations, and Rates debate. You can see the full video here: Valuations and Your … Continue reading Valuations and Your Rates
Phil Hayward Writes Talking Auckland welcomes guest posts around Auckland issues. If you would like to submit a guest post you can contact me at view[dot]of[dot]auckland[at]gmail[dot]com. Please remember … Continue reading Guest Essay: In Reply to Bill English on Housing in Auckland
One thing that I will ping National on is that some Ministers (Joyce, Smith, and even English at the moment (which is a shame)) thinking only on one dimensional terms rather than three dimensional terms.
I do not know what it is with Centre Right Parties here, Australia, the USA, and the UK when it comes to the difference between physical and social infrastructure. They can see physical infrastructure no problem but social infrastructure it seems they can not simply understand for the life of them.
Social infrastructure is as critically important as the physical infrastructure. If you lack the Social Infrastructure at State level we return to the Classic Liberal era of 19th Century Britain and the wild economic swings that would bring about Social Liberalism and the Welfare State up until the 1990’s.
Let me put it in a final form. A society that disconnect will prompt civil unrest and later wars. History has shown that to us again and again.
Time for National to take a history less fast.
One of the key responsibilities of incumbent upon Government is the provision of infrastructure.
This includes building railways roads, hospitals, power grids and policing, which forms an intrinsic part of our social infrastructure.
This government has been big on building.
It has spent unprecedented amounts of money on building transport infrastructure, things such as roads and railway lines as it sees these things, quite rightly, as the arteries, veins and capillaries of the New Zealand Economy. This is well and good, but over the last six years the National Government and its allies, which include the Maori Party, has consistently failed to acknowledge the historic and contemporary under-investment in social infrastructure.
To answer a question that the Government has only just noticed, but has been around for decades, Bill English has announce that the Government is looking to sell state houses. The logic seems to be that selling state houses…
View original post 337 more words
Guest Comment from Phil Hayward Talking Auckland welcomes guest posts around Auckland issues. If you would like to submit a guest post you can contact me at view[dot]of[dot]auckland[at]gmail[dot]com. Please … Continue reading Guest Comment on Auckland Council’s Auckland Affordability Spatial Trends
Again with the upcoming Fire Place Restrictions After our favourite journalist Bernard Orsman actually quoting the fact that pre 2005 wood burner restrictions stems from a Ministry for the … Continue reading Fire Places – Heated? Actually No
Libraries Obsolete?
I rather think not looking increasing patronage in our Auckland libraries. Libraries will evolve as e-book technology continues to rise but the library will still be a community hub where information, literature, and good place to have a read or scan on the Internet can happen very freely. Also Libraries act as Auckland Council repositories for official documents that come out for consultation from time to time.
Rebekka and I still use the library despite being Digital savvy alot.
An extract from the linked blog
In a recent Financial Times article about e-books and Amazon Prof John Kay casually dismissed public libraries as being doomed alongside printed books. He observed that readers might miss the “comfortable ambience” of libraries and likened library users to nostalgic steam train enthusiasts, but essentially his view was no harm would come if libraries disappeared. This blog post is based on my original response to that article.
It is not just library sceptics like Prof Kay who portray public libraries as more about printed knowledge than digital knowledge. Those campaigning to save libraries from spending cuts often point to the sacrilege of removing book shelves more than the inequality of the information divide and its conjoined twin, the digital divide. Free access to written knowledge as a route to a better life is what galvanised support for the first publicly-maintained libraries; not reading for the sake of reading. In 1852 Manchester opened the UK’s first free lending library and in his address at the grand opening, with Charles Dickens as guest of honour, Sir John Potter, Mayor of Manchester and main benefactor said:
We have been animated solely by the desire to benefit our poorer fellow-creatures. It is the duty of those who are more favoured by fortune than they, to do everything in their power to afford additional means of education and advancement to those classes.
W.R. Credland’s The Manchester Public Free Libraries (1899) a copy of which has been digitized by the Internet Archive project
In other words the purpose of the library was to enable the poor to build better lives.
Source and full article: Public libraries play a central role in providing access to data and ensuring the freedom of digital knowledge..
It would be a damn shame for Council to be doing library cutbacks in the 2015-2025 Long Term Plan due to Council financial mismanagement and wrong spending priorities….
I suppose this is a lesson on not giving a Public Authority a “lead” on a public art project as this Herald article from Bernard Orsman shows below:

The cost of the State House sculpture on Auckland’s Queens Wharf blew out to $1.924 million before being scaled back to $1.5 million, papers show.
Documents released under the Official Information Act to the Herald show the original plan was for the project to be finished in the first few months of this year. The completion date was later revised to February 2015 and is now some time beyond that.
Auckland Council announced plans for the sculpture in March last year, to be funded by a $1 million donation from Barfoot & Thompson, marking the company’s 90 years in business.
The documents show the cost of the sculpture – a “scaled version of a Mount Eden state house” by renowned artist Michael Parekowhai – had reached $1.9 million by May 2013.
Images of the sculpture have been shared with councillors but not the public, causing widespread criticism.
In February, Parekowhai told council public art manager Carole Anne Meehan he did not want early concept drawings and photos of a model to be “distributed publicly by anyone attending” a council meeting.
But several images were leaked to the Herald. They show a typical state house with external stairs leading to a platform offering multiple views of the chandelier filling the interior.
They also show a skylight, to allow cruise ship visitors berthing at Queens Wharf to peer inside the brilliantly coloured and intricate glass garden of native birds, flowers and insects inside the house that will glow softly at night.
A council source said if the council wanted to stuff up the sculpture it could not have done a better job.
Today, council chief operating officer Dean Kimpton said there was no fault with the process, but acknowledged it would have been better to have released images earlier.
He said the design had gone through a number of iterations, saying images and construction dates would be made public in mid-December.
“It is what it is. The design process has taken longer … and we have got a great result from Michael [Parekowhai]. I think the public are going to love it. I’m not anticipating a public backlash,” he said.
Asked about ratepayers underwriting up to $500,000 after the cost ballooned above the initial $1 million budget, Mr Kimpton was confident of attracting sponsorship once images, a story to wrap around it and a building deadline were made public.
He confirmed rumours that other suppliers were being considered for the chandelier, including glassworks in the United States and New Zealand, “but it is likely to be constructed in Italy”.
The documents show that Parekowhai was recommended “after careful consideration” as the “only candidate” for the artwork in late November 2012 after a shortlist of 11 potential artists, whose names were redacted, was drawn up.
Said Ms Meehan on November 26, 2012: “This is the right moment for a significant commission for Auckland by him [Parekowhai], as national and international recognition of his work is climbing.” She also recommended moving the sculpture from the cityside of Queens Wharf, a location “sabotaging” its potential, to the water’s edge at the end of the wharf.
The latest breakdown for the $1.5 million project, includes $705,000 for the chandelier, $415,000 for the building, an artist’s fee of $225,000 and $155,000 for a contingency and development costs.
A council document, dated May 15, says the project is a given and will not go out for public consultation in the new 10-year budget.
—————
Source: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11347859
The whole thing seems Gold Plated and an absolute disaster in handling since day one! Misinformation and lack of clear concise information from Council is certainly not helping either and this will feed on to other projects whether it be public art or something else.
Food for thought while I am with thousands of others at Armageddon today.
More on this tomorrow – as well as an Art Sculpture Council just can’t get its act together on…..
Well, to me, it is about setting the policies that make it as easy as possible for the residents of this land to have happy and satisfying lives.
It means ultimately, that every single person in this country, be they a natural citizen or not, should be able to look back on whatever portion of their lives that they spent in NZ and be able to honestly think to themselves on their death bed “I feel that I have had all of the choices and opportunities open to me in life.”
Whether they have made the right choices and taken their opportunities is not for the state to measure, but the state can play a part in providing equality of opportunity and freedom of choice by legislating where necessary, and removing barriers and rules where possible.
This means that we need, as a state to put our focus on some…
View original post 363 more words