Category: General

Everything else

Auckland Will NOT Get A Referendum on Transport Funding – Update 3

·

Governing Body Decides

 

In breaking news the Governing Body of Auckland Council has resolved to not to give Auckland a referendum next year on our transport funding options. The option that would have most likely been in play was whether Auckland wants a $2 motorway toll to help fund the $12 billion transport funding gap that is affecting projects like the Otahuhu and Manukau Transport Interchanges.

The vote failed 9-11

 

UPDATE

The Governing Body has resolved the following:

Recommendations
That the Governing Body:
a) agree to not undertake a referendum to seek feedback from Auckland electors on
transport investment and funding options.
b) direct the Chief Executive to commission an independent statistically reliable survey
to help inform choices about transport funding.

Vote passed 12-9

 

UPDATE 2

From Facebook

Cameron Brewer
Just now ·

Those of us pushing for the Mayor to deliver on this promised public (non-binding) referendum on alternative transport (eg tolls) funding just failed 9/11. However a small win for me as my amendments to his winning (12/9) proposal to do the consultation through the LTP instead, were successfully added which will hopefully help the public and the subsequent analysis.

C) that matters pertaining to alternative transport funding options are separated from the rest of the consultation document in a visually distinct way to highlight their significance to the people of Auckland

D) that feedback from submissions and responses to the LTP consultation document on alternative transport funding are independently reviewed and analysed by a suitably qualified and independent party who will report back their findings, and those from the statistically accurate survey, directly to the Governing Body.

 

 

UPDATE:

The Governing Body has resolved to send out to consultation the establishment of the new Auckland Development CCO. The Recommendations were:

Recommendation/s
That the Governing Body:
a) agree to progress evaluation of the establishment of an urban development agency
in order to further the council’s urban development objectives.
b) agree that the option to establish an urban development agency by combining
Waterfront Auckland and Auckland Council Properties Ltd is the preferred option.
c) note that the proposal for a new council controlled agency will be provided for in the
Long Term Plan and subject to public consultation.
d) agree to transfer responsibility for managing the council’s diversified financial assets
portfolio from Auckland Council Investments Limited to Auckland Council treasury
team, from 1 July 2015, and to reduce the number of Auckland Council

 

 

More as it happens

 

Mayor Caught Short on Airport Rail

·

Hmmmmmm

 

Yesterday a few of us saw this Tweet from Mayor Len Brown:

 

Effectively I Tweeted right back to the Mayor that what he Tweeted was rather rich by his own doing. In other words the Mayor once had the Airport Rail (from Onehunga) as Priority Two right behind the City Rail Link as Priority One (Airport Rail needs the CRL first to stop congestion between Newmarket and Britomart) but is now Priority NOTHING with the East West road Link now Priority Two.

 

Transport Blog did a piece on the Airport Rail falling to the wayside here: What Is Happening With Airport Rail?

 

So the Mayor gets caught short in a case of all words and no action…

 

Otahuhu and Manukau Transport Interchange Confusion

· 2 Comments ·

Still no clear communication from Auckland Transport

 

Source: Auckland Transport
Source: Auckland Transport

Otahuhu Interchange goes ahead but there is a catch Podcast

 

The excerpt from communications with Auckland Transport:

At the moment, Auckland Transport are operating in a very uncertain funding environment as they deal with potentially lower LTP capital expenditure in the Basic Transport Network (BTN) versus that in the Auckland Plan Transport Network (APTN). 

Auckland Transport have opted to progress design and potentially early works (within funding) on projects that would be funded in earlier years under the APTN to ensure momentum is not lost. 

And in the case of these two projects, the following would be the desired timeline without the constrained BTN funding:

  • Construction on the Manukau Bus Interchange project would start in the 1st quarter of 2015 with target completion in late 2015. Currently, the detailed design process is underway.
  • Construction of the Otahuhu Bus Train Interchange would start later this month with expected completion in late 2015. Currently, the detailed design process is underway.

 

In addition, Auckland Transport are currently exploring re-prioritisation options for these 2 projects.  As this is currently being worked through, no update to the draft LTP has been made. If re-prioritisation cannot be achieved in 2014/15 and in the early years of the LTP, Auckland Transport would only deliver on initial improvements within the current funding, with the delivery of full specification in 2020/21. 

Current Basic Transport Network (the Mayors proposal) budgeted figures:

Manukau Bus Interchange

  • We have design funding of $3.8m in 2014/15
  • Then there is no funding provided in the BTN programme until 2020/21
  • Total required funding is planned at $23.9m (inflated)

Otahuhu Bus Train Interchange

  • We have design and some early works funding of $6.3m in 2014/15
  • Then there is no funding provided in the BTN programme until 2020/21
  • Total required funding is planned at $26.8m (inflated)

—-ends—–

 

 

The BTN vs APTN Funding Situation

 

Context and Historic Posts on the Otahuhu and Manukau Interchange Situation (from oldest to newest)

Public Transport Projects Being Used as Political Weapons?

Update on Otahuhu Interchange

Otahuhu Interchange Proceeds

 

Updates as information comes to hand

 

Council Replies to Concern on IT Budget Blowouts

·

This is presented entirely without comment from me

 

Note: any future commentary will be in other posts

 

From Auckland Council

IT programme – no cost blowout

 

Following discussion of an update on Auckland Council’s Information Services Transformational Programme at today’s Finance and Performance Committee, council has released the report publicly.

Today’s committee agenda item (see resolutions below) sought to bring forward $24m to be spent in the earlier stages of the project, enabling efficiencies to be achieved later on.

The report (attached) covers the consolidation of core council information technology systems and addresses the reprioritisation of the programme to optimise outcomes, and the extension and enhancement of the testing programme.

Chief Operating Officer Dean Kimpton says there is no ‘cost blowout’ and rigorous risk management processes are being applied to the programme.

“There is no change to our overall IT budget and no increase in funding required; however, the NewCore component of the overall programme has increased in cost and will require an additional year to complete.

“We’ve taken a closer look at the complexity of our systems and carried out more detailed due diligence, which has given us a clearer picture of the priorities. As a result, we are accelerating some parts of the project and must adjust funding accordingly.

“We want to simplify our processes so Aucklanders have systems that are customer-friendly and easy to use, at their fingertips. Building consents, resource consents, rating, dog licensing and the booking of community facilities are some of the areas that will benefit from more customer-friendly online and IT systems.

“The accelerated $24m spend agreed at today’s committee is simply bringing forward some capital spend. We want all the inter-related parts of the programme rolled out in the optimal order. It’s also about applying more rigour to testing as we go forward and ensuring we are learning from any Novopay-type experiences,” Mr Kimpton says.

“We want to realise the benefits of the programme at a greater rate, hence we brought forward some of the spend,” he says.

An independent chief information officer (CIO) reference group, made up of CIOs from a range of public sector and corporate organisations, has brought strong governance oversight to the council’s IT transformation programme, and has endorsed the approach taken.

Independent expertise from EY has also brought critical oversight of the programme.

——ends—–

 

Further Information

 

Finance and Performance Committee Meeting – 20 November 2014

Resolutions:

  1. a) note the update and progress being made on the Organisation IS Transformation programme
  2. b) note the reprioritisation of the programme to optimise the overall outcomes of the programme and note that no additional funding for the IS transformation programme is requested
  3. c) approve the re-phasing of $24 million of IS transformation budget forward to the 2015 and 2016 years in order to optimise overall programme outcomes
  4. d) note the extended and intensified quality assurance and testing programme at a cost of $13m
  5. e) agree that the Council’s IT programme progress including NewCore be reported to this Committee on a quarterly basis
  6. f) agree that the item and report be considered in the open section of the meeting.

 

About NewCore:

The NewCore transformation (consolidation) project is complex. It is designed to consolidate the core systems from the eight legacy councils that support customer interactions, rates, regulatory services and related property data. Each legacy council had a different system (or group of systems) which collected and stored large amounts of complex data in different ways.

As well as consolidation, this project will reduce the cost of collecting information and managing these services. It aims to:

  • simplify and standardise customer and business processes for customer interaction, rates, regulatory services and related property data
  • enable more effective development of digital solutions for customers, giving them more choices around how they want to interact with council
  • consolidate core customer-facing  systems that support these processes
  • create a standardized base set of processes and systems for implementation of the Unitary Plan and bylaw reviews, where only one set of systems needs to be updated, as opposed to multiple legacy systems, and reducing the operational risk associated with complex end-of-life systems.

 

The Agenda Item concerning the IT situation

 

——————————————–

 

Might as well stick this up from Councillor Brewer seeming it is public record anyhow:

 

NO SPIN ZONE….

NewCore CAPEX budget has more than doubled in two years

Auckland Councillor Cameron Brewer says two official council reports two years apart show the capital expenditure budget for council’s NewCore computer system increasing by more than double from $58.1m to $124m. The Councillor for Orakei says the council is now desperate to downplay the project’s increasing costs by saying this is all just about shuffling around the organisation’s existing and wider IT budget.

“Let’s not lose sight that the full and final promise made to councillors in 2012 specified a total project capital cost less than half of what was highlighted in today’s report to Finance & Performance. Mr Brewer and other councillors were pleased the committee today debated the item in public after pressure for the matters to be taken out of confidential. “An amendment to defer any decisions to the full council next week was unfortunately lost 8/9, while my amendment which helpfully highlighted some home truths about the growing capital expenditure budget and expressed genuine council concern was amazingly lost 7/9:


BREWER/QUAX:

  • ‘Note that on 29 November 2012 councillors were advised that the “total cost of the programme is $71m made up of $58.1m CAPEX and $12.9m OPEX” while the 20 November 2014 report states that “total NewCore (CAPEX) costs post reset are $124m” with any additional operational expenditure not specified, and the committee records its utmost concern around future cost escalations and the project’s impact on Auckland Council’s other non-NewCore IT budget.’
  • “The public deserves to know that this project’s capital budget has changed dramatically in the past two years, not just hear the tricky spin denying any blow-out. This is not just about bringing some approved capital budget forward. This is a project which now has more than twice the total capital price-tag, and we still have no idea about any subsequent operational expenditure increases and impacts.
  • “To achieve all this they have raided the organisation’s wider IT budget for the next five years and so alarmingly we can now probably expect budget overruns in other IT areas in future years which is another big worry. Rest assured the hand will keep coming out,” says Cameron Brewer.