So What is Going On With Council HQ – aka The Tower? #AKLPols

An Update on the recladding issue

 

From Auckland Council and presented with no comment:

135 Albert Street budget approved

The council today approved a budget and project to replace stonework cladding on the council’s building at 135 Albert Street. This budget will now be subject to a procurement process so the amount will remain confidential until all contracts have been awarded.

Other confidential aspects of the report included legally privileged information.

At the meeting, Auckland Council General Manager Corporate Finance and Property Kevin Ramsay outlined the options for fixing the cladding issue and the budget required.

“It’s now time for us to move on to the next stage of this project, continue to address safety requirements and plan for remediation work to get underway.

“We have identified the issue, agreed to a way forward and will be confirming the parties that will work on this with us.

“We have been asked about recouping costs as the project progresses – this is something we will continue to investigate,” he says.

The proposal to replace the stonework cladding is based on a solution that retains the look and feel of the building; offers a full long-term warranty; is fire resistant and meets current building standards; better resists water ingress; makes future maintenance much easier and is cost effective.

Due diligence when the council purchased the building in 2012, and further investigative work since, confirmed a significant issue with the 25 year old building’s stone cladding. Some funding was set aside at the time of purchase and the requirement for work on the exterior of the building was also factored into purchase price negotiations.

The council’s decision to purchase 135 Albert Street has brought staff working within the CBD together, allowed it to vacate leased premises and enabled development of a more efficient working space.

 

Points of clarification:

  • Cost of hanging scaffold and working platform – this amounts to around half of the $4.7m brought forward at the 25 February Finance and Performance Committee meeting to begin safety mitigation works. The balance is going towards design, detailed analysis and costings for the substantive repairs

……

 

And from Finance and Performance Chair – Councillor Webster:

Statement from Cr Penny Webster, Chair of the Finance and Performance Committee 

In relation to a comment at today’s Finance and Performance Committee meeting referring to a case study on the Fletcher website, the chair has issued this statement.

Fletcher’s website carries a case study of work it carried out at 135 Albert Street and refers to a $44m cost associated with work done.

As reported to the 25 February 2016 Finance and Performance Committee meeting, following acquisition of the building $25m was spent on the physical fit out.  An additional $28m was spent on upgrades to building services, plant, lighting and water system to obtain sustainable efficiencies.

Fletcher’s was the Head Contractor and involved in these fit out and additional works, its contract amounted to a portion of this $53m budget.

In addition, it was queried whether cladding remediation work had been done previously by Fletcher as its website refers to ‘remediating the stone façade’. This relates to some work done on the upper levels involving investigation and minor maintenance only.

–ends—

 

The main media outlets are covering the rest of this saga.

 

Advertisements