Category: Uncategorized

Busways and why Whangaparaoa could use one.

Whangaparaoa, Howick, Pakuranga, Botany-Manukau, North Western Motorway; all prime candidates for good quality dedicated bus ways to get the people moving (both by bus and car) where Heavy Rail is not available and light rail is either a long way off or non viable.

Potential exists for Whangaparaoa being close to Silverdale and the Albany (Super) Metropolitan Centre. Will our leaders realise this?

(Answer is No)

Bryce P's avatarPearcy's Place

Pic courtesy of https://dgunderblog.wordpress.com/ Pic courtesy of https://dgunderblog.wordpress.com/

We know that the old suburbs in central Auckland were developed around the tram network. Indeed the tram network was the creator of the corridors we now know as Dominion Road, Mt Eden Road and Sandringham Road (and many others).

But, how do we emulate the kind of dense development the tram network created but without adding huge costs? Buses. Yes, dedicated busways added into existing transport corridors. Would it work? Well, in places globally that have introduced right of way bus lines, they work very well. Some were even built as a part of the development. They serve local areas and connect to Rapid Transit for longer journeys. Here is a couple of great blog posts about such a place. The subject is Almere in the Netherlands.

http://www.humantransit.org/2010/10/guest-post-richard-lenthall-on-the-busways-of-aimere-netherlands.html

http://www.humantransit.org/2010/10/aimere-netherlands-as-bus-oriented-development.html

How does this relate locally? Imagine if you will, a reinvigorated Whangaparaoa Road with pockets of…

View original post 96 more words

Auckland’s high rent prices might result in a decline in students

kaylahburke's avatarkaylah burke

By Kaylah Burke

Image: NZUSA 2014 Income and Expenditure surveyImage: NZUSA 2014 Income and Expenditure survey

Rising rent prices in Auckland might mean future tertiary students will choose to study elsewhere in New Zealand.

The New Zealand Union of Students’ Association says Auckland students are paying the highest regional rent rates in the country, according to its 2014 Income and Expenditure survey.

Auckland is the only city in New Zealand where maximum student allowance for a single applicant does not cover regional rent rates.

The July 2015 Auckland suburb report by Barfoot & Thompson, showed that the average rent for a three bedroom home in the city centre was $806 per week.

The students’ association survey shows that the average cost to rent in Auckland is $15.90 more than the second most expensive city, Christchurch.

Auckland University student Aron Roberts-Radford and his flatmate pay $400 a week to rent in central Auckland.

After five months of living…

View original post 456 more words

Hello world!

Welcome Bryce to the Auckland Blogging Community.

Excellent to see a fellow citizen from the North of the City to blog on urban and transport issues 🙂

I will from time to time reblog some of the big issues from the North that have regional consequences.
Again though welcome Bryce 🙂

Bryce P's avatarPearcy's Place

Welcome to The Orewa Urbanist. This site will mostly cover the Orewa area but also the surrounding Hibiscus Coast region and will ink to various sources of valuable information from around the world. If you’re unsure what ‘urbanism’ is, sit back and enjoy.

For background, I ride a bike when I can, I use public transport when I can, walk and yes, drive a car. I live in a 2 bedroom terraced apartment (with my wife and son) in the Kensington Park development at the northern end of Orewa. This is a quality medium density development and is, I believe, one of the very best in Auckland.

This blog is not about favouring modes of transport or types of dwelling you may wish to live in but more to perhaps open your mind to possibilities you may not have thought of. Well designed density is not something to be scared of.

View original post

Sense and ostensibility

Interesting comments on how ineffectual the main Opposition has been in the post Clark era.

On a Twitter note I have been pondering over the recent Twitter culls and blocks I have been doing given this situation

“not their friends in whatever faction empowers them, or the couple dozen activists who engage with them on twitter and support whatever they do.”

TPP and self-delusion

While dealing with the TPPA the culture of “I know best because I am an elite and you are just a well peasant” infiltrates right across the public sector including Council’s and their bureaucracies.

The end product? Mediocrity and usually a pretty shit product compared to if you let the people in as part of a collaborative process.

The case of biting off more than you can chew applies as well.

And yes the Unitary Plan processes right now are in their own way proving the above maxims

The half Labour got right and the half they got wrong

I like this statistical analysis out of the #Twyford debate so far.

From what I see the methodology was fine, where it went absolute tits up was reaching for a conclusion as Twyford did on The Nation on Saturday

From there the narrative was lost and as of this morning still lost as Labour keeps shovelling fresh poo into the fan.

As they say: Shit hitting the fan………

Chuan-Zheng Lee's avatarTHE CO-OP

By Chuan-Zheng Lee

I get that racism stirs emotions, but I try to give attempts at statistical analyses a fair hearing. About half of the work released by Labour on Saturday is actually sound. This half is also the half that has received the most criticism. Bayesian inference is a perfectly good means of developing probabilistic models about things like “based on their name, of what ethnicity is this person?” Reading Rob Salmond’s explanation of it yesterday, there’s nothing obviously untoward about this part of their methodology. I know a lot of people have felt offended about an apparent conflation of last name with role in the housing market, but strictly speaking, Labour’s analysis doesn’t imply it.

In statistical jargon, what Mr Salmond’s Bayesian analysis computes is an expectation (over Bayesian probabilities) of the number of buyers of each ethnicity, among those who bought a house between February and April with an unidentified agency representing 45% of…

View original post 1,080 more words

Housing Crisis: Targeting Chinese people isn’t what Olivia Pope would do

Lamia makes salient points here especially the five policy planks further down the post.

However, I feel there is a sixth plank missing although this is unique to Auckland. That is the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan is under Hearings at the moment.

With the Residential Zones making their way through workshops, mediation and then the Hearings in October I am reluctant to do anything gun-ho on trying to get the supply side moving any more than the Special Housing Area (as cumbersome as some of them are).

Why?

Well check this:

https://www.scribd.com/doc/270025222/059-063-Residential-Workshop-Outcomes-Session-1-5-Monday-22-June-Friday-26-June-2015

And this is before we even get the Rezoning exercises next year before the entire Plan goes live in about 12 months.

The point being is we dont know what changes to the Policies, Development Controls, or even the quantity of the medium and high density zones will do to potential development yield thus supply.

Will we get liberalisation that allows a greater amount of housing choices to be built thus bring the “crisis” under control or will the reverse happen and things get really bad.

We just do not know until the final version of the Unitary Plan is brought into operation next year. Once it is then we can work on things like Kiwi Build and even some of the demand side stuff.

Lamia I.'s avatarTHE CO-OP

By Lamia Imam

The current National government stopped recording the number of overseas residents buying houses in New Zealand. There’s actually no way for us to know the extent of damage non-residents are causing by buying up houses that apparently are rightfully ours. The way the Herald chose to present the problem in yesterday’s story is not only xenophobic but statistically unsound. The story is about a large chunk of buyer’s name being “Chinese”. Basically we have resorted to racially profiling buyers to explain why Kiwis are unable to buy their own homes? This is particularly heinous, given other surveys show that British and American buyers also make a chunk of the foreign purchase of Kiwi homes. And on top of that, Labour’s solution is really not a solution but rather an idea with little policy merit.

Keith Ng over at Public Address has broken down the actual number, addressing the…

View original post 739 more words