That Peer Reviewed Report for the Auckland Council (Unitary Plan) Development Capacity Model #AKLPols

Fontein and Thompson review the Council Development Capacity Model (ACDC15)

 

It has being cropping up in the news recently with The NBR picking up on it yesterday about the peer review of the Auckland Council Development Capacity Model (ACDC15) for the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Residential Zones). The peer review was ordered by Judge Kirkpatrick who chairs the Unitary Plan Hearing Panel in the latest saga to determine the potential capacity existing urban Auckland has to intensify its residential dwelling base.

 

The saga started here in late July: Unitary Plan Falls Very Short of Enabling Those 400,000 Homes Needed by 2041

Unitary Plan Falls Very Short of Enabling Those 400,000 Homes Needed by 2041

Try on current proposed provisions 316,000 (approximate) short

Finally the updated Residential Capacity Model has come out for submitters to use in their Hearings, and for the Unitary Plan Panel to consider in their recommendations next year.

I have the expert conference report below and will upload more material later next week.

In short the Unitary Plan is meant to enable some 400,000 dwellings on a 60% intensification, 40% Greenfield split through to 2041 as per the Auckland Plan. That means at minimum 240,000 residential dwellings need to be built in the existing urban area of Auckland (so Brownfield development).

Problem?

This:

The initial output of the ACDC15 development feasible dwellings, which total 64,420, or 20% of the CfGS13 (published) dwellings and 11.4% of the ACDC15 plan-enabled. If we were to add the 19,000 HNZC dwellings (conservative) that the PAUP allows, this would provide a total developable feasible dwelling number of 83,420 or 26% of the reported CfGS13 plan enabled.

…..

Link: Unitary Plan Falls Very Short of Enabling Those 400,000 Homes Needed by 2041

 

Layton Suburbia at Night Spot the bus station
Layton Suburbia at Night
Spot the bus station

 

As a result the Council and selected submitters to the Residential Zones of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (I was not one) reworked the Residential Zone Development Controls (height, bulk and density) and came out with this one month later (August 20): Council Reruns Development Capacity Model. Finds more areas viable for Housing

Council Reruns Development Capacity Model. Finds more areas viable for Housing

Council reruns the ACDC15 models and finds with alterations to the Unitary Plan more housing becomes viable to build

I was wondering when Auckland Council would rerun the Development Capacity Model through different scenarios of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan given the first attempt was pretty much a failure (see: Unitary Plan Falls Very Short of Enabling Those 400,000 Homes Needed by 2041).

From Auckland Council:

New model shows increase in number of houses possible under Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan.

Auckland Council has used the new Development Capacity Model to reveal how many houses could be built under the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP).

The Development Capacity model was developed by a group of independent experts at the request of the Panel who wanted to understand how much of the housing growth enabled by the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan could be actually developed in today’s market.

In July the Panel released data which had been generated by this new model. That data indicated that a total of  64,400 houses (excluding Housing NZ properties) would be commercially feasible to build under today’s market conditions when the Unitary Plan became operative in 2016.

Since receiving the data, the council has re-run the model inputting the suggested changes to the residential zone provisions so as to understand what impact those changes may have on that number of feasible houses.

The results have revealed that the suggested changes to the residential provisions of the PAUP have resulted in more houses being feasible than previously thought.

The key results are that the changes have resulted in a 56% increase in plan enabled dwellings and a 140% increase in dwellings commercially feasible. This means the number of dwellings that are commercially feasible today stands at 154,000 (excluding Housing New Zealand properties).

…….

Link: Council Reruns Development Capacity Model. Finds more areas viable for Housing

 

Suburbia at night
Suburbia at night

 

Following the ACDC15 re-run Judge Kirkpatrick ordered in September the Peer-Review of the ACDC15 modelling after strong objection from consultants Patrick Fontein and Adam Thompson:

#UnitaryPlan: Oh Council Wont Like This With the Development Capacity Model Being “Pinged”

Unitary Plan Hearings Panel Directs Council to rerun and peer review Auckland Council Development Capacity 2015 Model AGAIN!

 

The issue of how much existing urban Auckland can take in extra housing (Brownfield development and/or intensification) is becoming vexed to the point of rather ridiculous.

While I am preparing for Council’s Rebuttal Evidence that is due on October 6 (the Hearings are a week after that) on the Residential Zones I noticed this Directive from Judge Kirkpatrick of the Hearing Panel to Council (and two others) on the Auckland Council Development Capacity Model (ACDC15) for those Residential Zones.

Here is the Directive: (Click link below)

…..

Link: #UnitaryPlan: Oh Council Wont Like This With the Development Capacity Model Being “Pinged”

 

Suburbia with a tourist district being built
Suburbia with a tourist district being built

 

And as predicted not long soon after here comes the dissension in the ranks:

Dissension Over #UnitaryPlan Directive on Development Capacity For Unitary Plan Residential Zones

Auckland 2040 Not Happy with ACDC15 Directive

 

This morning I blogged on the Directive the Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel issued on doing a third run of the Auckland Council Development Capacity Model (ACDC15) for the Unitary Plan Residential Zones (see: #UnitaryPlan: Oh Council Wont Like This With the Development Capacity Model Being “Pinged”)

In that post I wrote:

Rather ouch to Council as their re-run of the ACDC15 model in which they were pinning on would show the market feasible would increase from the initial 11% to over 60%. But it seems the Panel is not convinced thus the directive issued above that is going to have implications on the proposed controls for the Residential Zones and later on Topic 081 which is the rezoning exercise.

I am going to take a hunch that what the proposed development controls are for the Residential Zones in the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (density controls removed and height limits increased) are fine (unlike the Centres Zones) but where the respective zones are placed will be causing the major issues.

It might be a case of once the Residential Zones hearing is complete next month that initial runs on moving the zones around might need to be done to see how the development feasibility ends up. Of course legally this would open up the Rezoning exercise of Topic 081 for public submissions again to allow natural justice to occur. Just maybe this needs to be done and the Hearings extended six months beyond the nominal time frame of July 2016 to ensure everything to do with the Residential Zones and their spatial placement is correct.

Will see how Council reacts to the Panel Directive this week.

………………..

 

Well for the most I was right with what I said above, it is that Auckland 2040 reacted to the Directive first before Council did.

Auckland 2040’s Richard Burton sent a memo to the Panel this morning outlying his concerns.

…………………

Link: https://voakl.net/2015/09/28/breaking-dissension-over-unitaryplan-directive-on-development-capacity-for-unitary-plan-residential-zones/

 

Yes that is 85% treated sewerage being discharged
Yes that is 85% treated sewerage being discharged

 

Last week Fontein and Thompson released their Peer-Review on the Auckland Council Development Capacity (ACDC15) and their report can be read below:

 

Their Executive Summary stating:

Fontein UP peer review Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/284477565/059-060-062-and-063-Hrg-Patrick-Fontein-and-Property-Council-New-Zealand-Patrick-Fontein-and-Adam-Thompson-Supplementary-Evidence
Fontein UP peer review
Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/284477565/059-060-062-and-063-Hrg-Patrick-Fontein-and-Property-Council-New-Zealand-Patrick-Fontein-and-Adam-Thompson-Supplementary-Evidence

 

So still major flaws in the re-run ACDC15 model however, as noted on 1.7 above it can work once more thorough testing is done. Problem is the Hearings for the Residential Zones start tomorrow.

 

[Yes the Cities Skylines Pictures are in there to break up wall of text for you 😀 ]

Advertisements