From Yesterday’s Proceedings As usual Bernard Orsman has one heck of a slant on “proceedings” that might happen at a Council Committee meeting. His interpretation was much different then … Continue reading Unitary Plan Report
An issue causing hot discussion either here in the blog or in the wider community
From Yesterday’s Proceedings As usual Bernard Orsman has one heck of a slant on “proceedings” that might happen at a Council Committee meeting. His interpretation was much different then … Continue reading Unitary Plan Report
Council has just endorsed the Lot 59-Concept on the Manukau Interchange and future subsequent developments in the area. Having read the Auckland Transport Blog comments (and they are for the most part educated comments so I take them with a measure of seriousness), reviewed feedback I got back after I posted on the issue yesterday and today, and compare it to what is being looked in the Manukau Super Metropolitan Centre work that is slowly starting, I am rejecting the endorsement given.
Thus I will have a discussion with clients TotaRim has in the Manukau area and decide whether to lobby council to get the interchange redesigned better.
Because to be honest it is a poor standard design and will be both asking for trouble and not serve Manukau and wider South Auckland as it should! I am sorry but it is a design and reinforces 1970s planning that makes Manukau currently unloved and so needing much love.
We can do better and Council and AT need to be shown that.
I will seek advice on whether I can speak against the Concept at the next Auckland Plan Committee meeting…
Gallery of my own Alternative This is a Gallery of basic Sketch Up mock ups of my alternative to Auckland Transport‘s Manukau Interchange. You can see yesterday’s post about … Continue reading Manukau Interchange – An Alternative
This keeps cropping up today thanks to Councillor Cameron Brewer:
Polls cost millions
Len Brown‘s Auckland Council has spent more than $5.1 million on pollsters and surveys in the past three years.
A council spokesman said about 60 per cent of the spending was required under law, mainly for annual planning and reporting.
But councillor Cameron Brewer said spending on pollsters was “out of control”.
Brewer said: “Think of the improvements a local park or playground could’ve enjoyed with this money. Instead it’s all gone into lining the pockets of private pollsters.”
The figures were released to Brewer under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act.
“It’s time to stop the spinning and get back to delivering core council services for ratepayers,” he said. He suspected the polling was being done for “purely political reasons”.
A further $212,237 has been spent on around 15,827 panellists that the council use to “have their say on a wide range of council issues, activities and plans”.
…
You can read the rest over at the Herald site.
Seriously though is this all Cameron and candidate for mayorship Palino really think about at the moment?
While conducting polls is a vexed issue (and rightfully so), the People’s Panel to which I participate in is a straight forward exercise.
You sign up and periodically you get to fill out an electronic survey that comes into your email box. Where ever you can access the emails you can do the survey. And that means some days I might be filling one out at a lunch break in Town Hall. Most are short (although I did get a long one on parks and recreation) and relate to CORE service issues Council provide and the Right Wing blather on about.
The surveys I have done from the People’s Panel have included:
I seriously don’t see what the problem is with the People’s Panel (which do release summaries after the said survey). The surveys are designed to be quick, efficient and “portable” for when Council, the Local Boards, or even Auckland Transport are scoping out opinions.
Yes Desley (of Orakei) we can go to the Local Boards and the Local Boards can come to us. But, that can be slow and cumbersome when one needs a quick fire quantitative survey done on something. Heck even the Papakura Local Board engaged in a People’s Panel survey on the proposed Library.
I would assume my Local Board would then hold face to face or submission sessions on the Library if the survey results were in favour of the proposal.
So the People’s Panel has its use and I don’t mind giving my opinions to the Council in that format when they want to answer something particular. It can sure beat writing 105 page submissions and long blog posts to boot.
But, in their drive for “savings” and “core services” it would seem Brewer and Palino would cut off an actual “core service” – by denying an easy medium for Council to (you know Cameron seeming you go on about it) engage with the local or wider community.
Oh and if you wonder about the gauge of opinions, well I know the Panel would be diverse if my comments and Facebook friend Scott’s are anything to go by. Some days we would agree other days the Centre Left and Centre Right arguments (me being the “young Tory) will come out. And by looking at the Civic Forums the mix was reasonably balanced except on the geographic front where South Auckland was lacking in numbers BADLY!
Come on guys find better ways in getting our rates bill down – while not hobbling an engagement arm Council and running distractions on lack of hard policy…
Sorry Not Inspiring I have read the plans about five times now in regards for the proposed Manukau Interchange that will be discussed tomorrow at the Auckland Plan Committee. … Continue reading The Manukau Interchange
So are we going this way or that with Port of Auckland I know I was going to be “silent” on running Port of Auckland Commentary but, this article … Continue reading Port Confusion?
August 13 is going to be a very long and contentious day in Town Hall starting at 10am sharp.
While the agenda is not as long as the Transport Committee agenda’s (and that is only due to the Auckland Transport monthly report from its respective Board being added) it does stand at 200 odd pages long and has five heavy items in there. They being:
You can see the main agenda and the addendum agenda below
Of course I will be in attendance at that Committee meeting and Tweeting live as the updates and moves occur. Also an update on the Congestion Free Network should also arrive on Tuesday (the 13th as well).
As I said in the beginning, it will be a long and contentious day as the heavy stuff progresses through.
And You Can See Everyone Else Too! While I was in Tauranga the Auckland Council finally released all our submissions in the first round of the Unitary Plan Feedback … Continue reading Your Unitary Plan Feedback is Out NOW
This is a case of here we go again with Port of Auckland and its more modest expansion plans at its Waterfront site.
Seems Bernard Orsman has a new (well old) topic to go latch onto until August 13 – when the Auckland Plan Committee meets again.
The Herald is planning to run a “series” on the latest plans for expansion at the Waitemata site. Talking Auckland though will not be running any commentary on the latest rounds from POAL and its expansion proposals.
The reason being that I have originally covered matters relating to the Port expansion plans earlier (check the Waterfront Auckland Waterfront Index at the top of the page) as well as that there is no new material to comment on until Part Two of the review is conducted (if it ever will be). Orsman did handily outline the two parts to the review for easy reference:
From the NZ Herald
By Bernard Orsman @BernardOrsman
Expansion plan reviews – what’s involved
Stage 1
* A technical study by PricewaterhouseCoopers on the current and future freight demand and supply for the three upper North Island ports, Auckland, Tauranga and Northland.
It found:
* The upper North Island needs all its ports to meet strong growth, and the best way to meet future demand is to grow the ports.
* Ports of Auckland is likely to face capacity constraints before Tauranga and Northland.
* Losing the 3ha of land at Captain Cook and Marsden wharves would make matters worse.
* Further reclamation needed over the next 30 years, but less than previously thought.
Stage 2
* To inform the long-term strategic planning choices for the Auckland waterfront.
To consider:
* Different configurations and alternative locations for Ports of Auckland.
* Economic costs and benefits of various options.
* Alignment with current transport strategies, plans and programmes.
* Legal and other barriers to various options.
* Auckland Council engaging with communities with an interest in port development about the results of the work.
—ends—
While I am on my Winter Holiday Why does the “good stuff” that will kick off a fierce debate occur when I am away on leave or holiday. In … Continue reading Transport Committee to Discuss Rail Patronage