I Believe in a Second CBD NOT Shifting the Existing One With Auckland Transport Blog stuck in their Mono Core Centric view thus a guest post from myself over … Continue reading Manukau as the Second CBD – A Clarification
I Believe in a Second CBD NOT Shifting the Existing One With Auckland Transport Blog stuck in their Mono Core Centric view thus a guest post from myself over … Continue reading Manukau as the Second CBD – A Clarification
Manukau’s Potential While I wait for Orsman to go drop the next piece to be debunked I thought I might share you this what was shared to me. … Continue reading Manukau Like This
While considerations and deliberations over Manukau are underway, another piece of work that I undertook with the Unitary Plan is also being worked on. Last month I gave a presentation to the Orakei Local Board in regards to concerns by St Heliers over Unitary Plan development in their area. Hence the Special Character Zone was born, and the Centralised Master Community Plan brought back out of the cupboard.
Two resolutions were passed by the Local Board that night and the SCZ work strengthened before it is taken around the rest of Auckland. The resolutions were (and is on public record):
OR/2013/84 Unitary Plan Zoning Issues FILE REF CP2013/08075 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.4 MOVED by Member DEC Simpson, seconded Member M Thomas:a) That the Orakei Local Board thanks Benjamin Ross for his presentation and asks his permission to forward the presentation to key stakeholders to possibly consider when they make their submissions to the Unitary Plan.b) That the Orakei Local Board asks regional and local planning officers for comment on the feasibility of Mr Ross’ proposed Special Character Zones (SCZ) and Centralised Master Community Plans (CMCP).
So now I await the officer feedback on the proposals. This will be important before the concept is taken to the Albert-Eden Local Board as a potential solution to the Mt Eden Village situation that is still unfolding. In the mean time submission compiling and writing continues
BR:AKL: Bring Well Managed Progress
The Unitary Plan: Bringing Change
Auckland: 2013 – OUR CITY, OUR CALL
The Manukau as the Second CBD of Auckland Presentation Yesterday I gave my presentation to the Auckland Plan Committee on ‘Manukau as the Second CBD of Auckland.’ I … Continue reading The Manukau Presentation
Busy Monday and Tuesday Ahead This week is my technical final round of engagements with the Unitary Plan – as far as this part of the process goes. Further … Continue reading This Week
Finally my presentation to the Auckland Plan Committee (May 14) is ready to go. I have sent both the Powerpoint presentation and the 41 page supplementary booklet to Council to be attached with the Agenda (which at the moment is embedded below) and can be seen below.
The Powerpoint Presentation (9-slides) which I will be speaking from can be seen here:
The Supplementary Booklet (41 pages) for your in-depth reading can be found here:
The presentation will be summarising three points:
Information used in the booklet will also go into my feedback for the Unitary Plan by May 31
I will also be attending the Generation Zero Unitary Plan forum event on Tuesday evening after the presentation to mix and mingle and discuss well – Unitary Plan
All go on Tuesday
BR:AKL: Bring Well Managed Progress
The Unitary Plan: Bringing Change
Auckland: 2013 – OUR CITY, OUR CALL
Last night the public meeting over the Redoubt Road/Mill Road was held at the Vodafone Events Centre where around 160 people showed up. My apologies in not attending that particular meeting last night as I was home on both family time and completing my Manukau CBD presentation. Just noting a sense of what could be irony; while I am not a big fan of the corridor up Redoubt Road and down part of Mill Road (basically to the Alfriston Road intersection), if Manukau is going to be brought up as a CBD and the existing industry expands in the area we will need to be looking at some serious transport options rather quick.
Any how so the meeting went ahead last night although from what I can fathom no one from Auckland Transport nor the Council’s Transport Committee was present.Councillors Calum Penrose and Sir John Walker as the Manurewa-Papakura Ward Councillors were present though. I also note that Green MP Julie Ann Genter was present however as well as Forest and Bird? Enough for me to raise an eye brow at this point in time as I wonder what alternatives this group would propose (apart from the Takanini Interchange upgrade allowing the 6-lane-ing of State Highway One) when Manukau takes off again and the Rural Urban Boundary has a very good chance moving East to Mill Road in the next 30-years.
I have written two particular posts on the Mill Road Corridor so far (along with the AT Plans attached). Yes I am meaning to write-up an alternative but, will not do so until my submission to the Unitary Plan is in at the end of the month:
The Herald also wrote a piece on last night’s public meeting as well: “324 properties in road’s path”
I did particularly note from that Herald article a quip about the Eastern Highway being defeated. Umm no it has not. The designation is still there and part of it is being built as a legacy project that we know as AMETI. At the same time there is nothing stopping NZTA from taking the reigns and building the Highway project, something that I would not put pass them with the current Government in power. In any case the failure of that highway being built along with the Botany Line which was to come with it is already costing the city as it is most days of the week in bottle-necking and economic inefficiencies. So I would be very careful in making analogies to the Eastern Highway (and Botany Line) in regards to other projects in the pipeline.
If anyone that did go last night would like to drop a guest commentary on the public meeting, drop me a line either in the comment box or via email and I’ll see what I can arrange.
In the mean time, we continue to wait on Auckland Transport’s fine grain analysis of the corridor.
A Graphic on my Proposal for Manukau I have completed the draft presentation and master booklet for my Auckland Plan Committee presentation next week and am getting it cleaned … Continue reading Work Continues on Manukau Presentation
Some Answers on Papakura As a Metropolitan Centre Yesterday I posted on me heading to a Unitary Plan meeting on Papakura. The meeting was to cover Papakura … Continue reading Questions and Answers on Papakura
Commentary and community meetings continue as The Unitary Plan causes further debate from all sides. I am continuing my jet-setting around the city – although with a main focus closer to home in Southern Auckland and this is where I will be for the final weeks of this round of Unitary Plan feedback.
Please note that while the Unitary Plan feedback closes 31 May; BR:AKL will continue Unitary Plan commentary while TotaRim Consultancy Limited will continue to offer Unitary Plan services to wider Auckland.
These are my final rounds of engagement for this part of the Unitary Plan. It has been quite a journey since March 27 when I both started jet-setting around the city attending Unitary Plan community meetings, running Unitary Plan commentary, giving presentations, and now finalising my submission for the UP. Still got plenty of work to do as the Unitary Plan hits notification around September (at current speed) and all that will entail. But as I mentioned earlier; I will be carrying on my Unitary Plan work – albeit on a more “professional” basis now through TotaRim (which is now open for business).
BR:AKL: Bring Well Managed Progress
The Unitary Plan: Bringing Change
Auckland: 2013 – OUR CITY, OUR CALL