From Yesterday’s Proceedings As usual Bernard Orsman has one heck of a slant on “proceedings” that might happen at a Council Committee meeting. His interpretation was much different then … Continue reading Unitary Plan Report
From Yesterday’s Proceedings As usual Bernard Orsman has one heck of a slant on “proceedings” that might happen at a Council Committee meeting. His interpretation was much different then … Continue reading Unitary Plan Report
Council has just endorsed the Lot 59-Concept on the Manukau Interchange and future subsequent developments in the area. Having read the Auckland Transport Blog comments (and they are for the most part educated comments so I take them with a measure of seriousness), reviewed feedback I got back after I posted on the issue yesterday and today, and compare it to what is being looked in the Manukau Super Metropolitan Centre work that is slowly starting, I am rejecting the endorsement given.
Thus I will have a discussion with clients TotaRim has in the Manukau area and decide whether to lobby council to get the interchange redesigned better.
Because to be honest it is a poor standard design and will be both asking for trouble and not serve Manukau and wider South Auckland as it should! I am sorry but it is a design and reinforces 1970s planning that makes Manukau currently unloved and so needing much love.
We can do better and Council and AT need to be shown that.
I will seek advice on whether I can speak against the Concept at the next Auckland Plan Committee meeting…
Gallery of my own Alternative This is a Gallery of basic Sketch Up mock ups of my alternative to Auckland Transport‘s Manukau Interchange. You can see yesterday’s post about … Continue reading Manukau Interchange – An Alternative
This keeps cropping up today thanks to Councillor Cameron Brewer:
Polls cost millions
Len Brown‘s Auckland Council has spent more than $5.1 million on pollsters and surveys in the past three years.
A council spokesman said about 60 per cent of the spending was required under law, mainly for annual planning and reporting.
But councillor Cameron Brewer said spending on pollsters was “out of control”.
Brewer said: “Think of the improvements a local park or playground could’ve enjoyed with this money. Instead it’s all gone into lining the pockets of private pollsters.”
The figures were released to Brewer under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act.
“It’s time to stop the spinning and get back to delivering core council services for ratepayers,” he said. He suspected the polling was being done for “purely political reasons”.
A further $212,237 has been spent on around 15,827 panellists that the council use to “have their say on a wide range of council issues, activities and plans”.
…
You can read the rest over at the Herald site.
Seriously though is this all Cameron and candidate for mayorship Palino really think about at the moment?
While conducting polls is a vexed issue (and rightfully so), the People’s Panel to which I participate in is a straight forward exercise.
You sign up and periodically you get to fill out an electronic survey that comes into your email box. Where ever you can access the emails you can do the survey. And that means some days I might be filling one out at a lunch break in Town Hall. Most are short (although I did get a long one on parks and recreation) and relate to CORE service issues Council provide and the Right Wing blather on about.
The surveys I have done from the People’s Panel have included:
I seriously don’t see what the problem is with the People’s Panel (which do release summaries after the said survey). The surveys are designed to be quick, efficient and “portable” for when Council, the Local Boards, or even Auckland Transport are scoping out opinions.
Yes Desley (of Orakei) we can go to the Local Boards and the Local Boards can come to us. But, that can be slow and cumbersome when one needs a quick fire quantitative survey done on something. Heck even the Papakura Local Board engaged in a People’s Panel survey on the proposed Library.
I would assume my Local Board would then hold face to face or submission sessions on the Library if the survey results were in favour of the proposal.
So the People’s Panel has its use and I don’t mind giving my opinions to the Council in that format when they want to answer something particular. It can sure beat writing 105 page submissions and long blog posts to boot.
But, in their drive for “savings” and “core services” it would seem Brewer and Palino would cut off an actual “core service” – by denying an easy medium for Council to (you know Cameron seeming you go on about it) engage with the local or wider community.
Oh and if you wonder about the gauge of opinions, well I know the Panel would be diverse if my comments and Facebook friend Scott’s are anything to go by. Some days we would agree other days the Centre Left and Centre Right arguments (me being the “young Tory) will come out. And by looking at the Civic Forums the mix was reasonably balanced except on the geographic front where South Auckland was lacking in numbers BADLY!
Come on guys find better ways in getting our rates bill down – while not hobbling an engagement arm Council and running distractions on lack of hard policy…
Sorry Not Inspiring I have read the plans about five times now in regards for the proposed Manukau Interchange that will be discussed tomorrow at the Auckland Plan Committee. … Continue reading The Manukau Interchange
So are we going this way or that with Port of Auckland I know I was going to be “silent” on running Port of Auckland Commentary but, this article … Continue reading Port Confusion?
August 13 is going to be a very long and contentious day in Town Hall starting at 10am sharp.
While the agenda is not as long as the Transport Committee agenda’s (and that is only due to the Auckland Transport monthly report from its respective Board being added) it does stand at 200 odd pages long and has five heavy items in there. They being:
You can see the main agenda and the addendum agenda below
Of course I will be in attendance at that Committee meeting and Tweeting live as the updates and moves occur. Also an update on the Congestion Free Network should also arrive on Tuesday (the 13th as well).
As I said in the beginning, it will be a long and contentious day as the heavy stuff progresses through.
And You Can See Everyone Else Too! While I was in Tauranga the Auckland Council finally released all our submissions in the first round of the Unitary Plan Feedback … Continue reading Your Unitary Plan Feedback is Out NOW
And we are back from out short mid-winter break in Tauranga and Rotorua – back to the grind that is Auckland.
Although both Bekka and I do have a “day off” tomorrow it will be spent preparing for a hectic week next week.
August 13 will be the busy day as the Auckland Plan Committee meets to note further interim directions on the Unitary Plan which this round has some meaty stuff in it. That meaty stuff also includes Port of Auckland which has cropped back up as it pushes on with expansion plans at its current Waterfront site.
You can see part of the Agenda HERE – although the Unitary Plan material has not be released yet. Once it has been done so I will upload that material into Scribd and into Talking Auckland.
Pretty much Action Stations next week. Always seems to be when one returns from a holiday.
I caught the update to the train incident that was reported in the NZ Herald on Monday and subsequent reaction in Talking Auckland soon afterwards.
This is the update from Stuff:
After Transdev and Auckland Transport viewed Colour CCTV footage there was more to the saga than meets the eye originally when reported from the black and white CCTV footage at Takanini Station.
As a result of this update and the respective Talking Auckland Post on Monday (now fully retracted) I do offer a full and utter apology to Ms Johnson and her children.
In light of the issue, further measures will be put into place to make sure this kind of incident does not occur again at Talking Auckland. In saying that there is always a risk when doing “second-hand” reporting from a Main Stream Media source into a blog post. However, utmost professionalism will occur when running commentary on such emotive issues.
In saying this I need not remind Auckland that the rail network is a very dangerous place and can kill. The case of the dad running to the train as it was departing from Ranui Station last year resulting in the accident and eventual death as he slipped from the platform, underneath the train and was effectively run over in front of his family and other passengers is that STARK reminder of what happens when something can go so utterly wrong.
So please in light of all of this: Please be at the platform 5 minutes before the scheduled departure of the train with your ticket ready or AT-HOP card tagged on.
As for Te Mahia Station – lobbying continues for it to be fully closed!